Evaluating measurement properties of subjective cognitive decline self-reported outcome measures: a systematic review.

Journal: Systematic reviews

Volume: 11

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland. aliaa.ibnidris@usi.ch. Epidemiology Research Unit, Caribbean Institute for Health Research, The University of the West Indies, Mona Campus, Kingston, Jamaica. Fondazione Agnelli, Turin, Italy. Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.

Abstract summary 

Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is present in the early stage of preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline and AD dementia later in life. Early detection of at-risk groups with subjective complaints is critical for targeted dementia prevention at the earliest. Accurate assessment of SCD is crucial. However, current measures lack important psychometric evaluations and or reporting.To systematically evaluate measurement properties of self-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used to assess SCD in the older adult population with or at risk of AD.We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 Checklist for reporting. We conducted a literature search, screened, and included validation studies of SCD based on self-reported questionnaires from both population-based and clinical studies, conducted in older adults (≥ 55). We critically appraised the included primary studies using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported psychometric properties of 17 SCD self-reported questionnaires. We extracted data on the structural validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and cross-cultural validity and found a widespread proneness to bias across studies, and a marked heterogeneity is assessed and reported measurement properties that prevented the consolidation of results.Our findings suggest that available SCD questionnaires lack content validity evaluation. Currently available measurements of SCD lack development and validation standards. Further work is needed to develop and validate SCD self-reported measurement with good quality measurement properties.

Authors & Co-authors:  Ibnidris Aliaa A Robinson Janelle N JN Stubbs Marissa M Piumatti Giovanni G Govia Ishtar I Albanese Emiliano E

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Price JL, Davis PB, Morris JC, White DL. The distribution of tangles, plaques and related immunohistochemical markers in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1991;12:295–312. doi: 10.1016/0197-4580(91)90006-6.
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 144
SSN : 2046-4053
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Aged
Other Terms
Assessment;Cognitive dysfunction;Measurement properties;PROM;Preclinical AD;Subjective
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England