Abstract summary 

In 2014, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Disabilities adopted recommendations advising the replacement of involuntary care with supported care. This has polarised many about how best to provide for People living with Mental Conditions (PLPCs). Notwithstanding the contentions of this debate, we find on a personal discursive level that involuntary care is concealed as a self-evident and unquestionable response to the treatment of PLPCs. This can mean that policy-makers and professionals reproduce approaches to PLPCs uncritically. Considering these complexities, we used Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to examine what current norms surround involuntary care in the South African psy-complex, and how these are reproduced. We interviewed nine members of the South African psy-complex, including review board members, psychologists, and psychiatrists, and found several discourses maintaining current psychiatric norms. These include biomedical and techno-disciplinary discourses of treatment, clinico-legal disciplinary and danger discourses, and paternalistic discourses of institutional care. Each of these uniquely highlights the ways in which involuntary care is maintained and normalised, revealing that careful consideration is required to prevent potential human rights violations on behalf of professionals and policy-makers, regardless of whether in involuntary or support paradigms.

Authors & Co-authors:  Freeman Alex A Graham Tanya T

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source