A collaborative care package for depression comorbid with chronic physical conditions in South Africa.

Journal: BMC health services research

Volume: 22

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College, Mazisi Kunene Road, Durban, , South Africa. peterseni@ukzn.ac.za. Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College, Mazisi Kunene Road, Durban, , South Africa. Knowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK. Knowledge Translation Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. lara.fairall@kcl.ac.uk.

Abstract summary 

A task-sharing collaborative care model for integrated depression care for South Africa's burgeoning primary health care population with chronic conditions was developed and tested through two pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trials. One trial focused on patients with hypertension and was located in one district where a collaborative care model was co-designed with district stakeholders. The other trial, focused on patients on antiretroviral treatment, was located in the same district site, with the addition of a second neighbouring district, without adaptation of the original model. This paper describes the package used to implement this model, and implementation outcomes across the two sites, and summarises lessons and challenges.The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) framework, adapted for complex health systems interventions, was used to describe components of the package. Additional elements of 'modifications made' and 'actual implementation' introduced in the 'Getting messier with TIDieR' framework, were used to describe implementation outcomes in terms of reach, adoption and implementation across the two trial districts.In the absence of a co-design process to adapt the model to the context of the second site, there was less system level support for the model. Consequently, more project employed human resources were deployed to support training of primary care nurses in identification and referral of patients with depression; and supervise co-located lay counsellors. Referrals to co-located lay counselling services were more than double in the second site. However, uptake of counselling sessions was greater in the first site. This was attributed to greater in-vivo supervision and support from existing mental health specialists in the system. There was greater reliance on online supervision and support in the second site where geographical distances between clinics were larger.The need for in-country co-designed collaborative care models, and 'implementation heavy' implementation research to understand adaptations required to accommodate varying in-country health system contexts is highlighted.

Authors & Co-authors:  Petersen Inge I Selohilwe One O Georgeu-Pepper Daniella D Ras Christy-Joy CJ Zani Babalwa B Petrus Ruwayda R Anderson Lauren L Mntambo Ntokozo N Kathree Tasneem T Bhana Arvin A Thornicroft Graham G Fairall Lara L

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Mayosi BM, Lawn JE, van Niekerk A, Bradshaw D, Abdool Karim SS, Coovadia HM. Health in South Africa: changes and challenges since 2009. Lancet. 2012;380(9858):2029–2043. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61814-5.
Authors :  12
Identifiers
Doi : 1465
SSN : 1472-6963
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Co-designed collaborative care model;Integrated mental health care;Pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial;Task-sharing
Study Design
Randomized Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
England