Key implementation factors in telemedicine-delivered medications for opioid use disorder: a scoping review informed by normalisation process theory.

Journal: The lancet. Psychiatry

Volume: 10

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK; Forward Leeds and Humankind Charity, Durham, UK. Electronic address: jbtwt@st-andrews.ac.uk. DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Neuroscience, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; the Child Study Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. National Drug Dependence Treatment Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Addiction Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; Research Center, Institute of Mental Health, Montréal University, Montréal, QC, Canada. Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. School of Medicine, Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya (UVIC-UCC), Barcelona, Spain. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, Lisbon, Portugal. DigitAS Project, Population and Behavioural Science, School of Medicine, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK; NHS Fife Addiction Services, Leven, UK.

Abstract summary 

Telemedicine could improve access to medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Telemedicine-delivered MOUD (TMOUD) has expanded substantially in response to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic on in-person clinical contact, yet this expansion has not happened consistently across all health systems and countries. This Review aims to understand key factors in TMOUD implementation that might explain variations in uptake. We did a scoping review using three English language databases for articles reporting on the implementation of TMOUD services. 57 peer-reviewed articles were identified, subjected to open coding and thematic analysis, and further interpreted through normalisation process theory (NPT). NPT was originally used to evaluate telehealth innovations and has been applied extensively to describe, assess, and develop the implementation potential of a broad range of complex health-care interventions. By categorising our findings according to the four core NPT constructs of coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring, we aim to rationalise the current evidence base to show the workability of TMOUD in practice. We find that variations in TMOUD models in practice depend on organisations' attitudes towards risk, clinicians' tensions around giving up control over standard practices, organisation-level support in overcoming operational and technological challenges, and evaluation methods that might neglect a potential widening of the digital divide.

Authors & Co-authors:  Teck Joseph Tay Wee JTW Zlatkute Giedre G Perez Alberto A Dritschel Heidi H Ghosh Abhishek A Potenza Marc N MN Ambekar Atul A Ekhtiari Hamed H Stein Dan D Khazaal Yasser Y Arunogiri Shalini S Torrens Marta M Ferri Marica M Galea-Singer Susanna S Baldacchino Alex A

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  15
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/S2215-0366(22)00374-1
SSN : 2215-0374
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Study Design
Case Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Mali
Publication Country
England