ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors (ENACT) tool: adaptation and psychometric properties in South Africa.

Journal: Global mental health (Cambridge, England)

Volume: 9

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. Curtin enAble Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Western Australia, Australia. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Center for Rural Health, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa. Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

The ENhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic factors (ENACT) tool measures a set of therapeutic competencies required for the effective psychological intervention, including delivery by non-specialists. This paper describes the systematic adaptation of the ENACT for the South African (SA) context and presents the tool's initial psychometric properties.We employed a four-step process: (1) Item generation: 204 therapeutic factors were generated by SA psychologists and drawn from the original ENACT as potential items; (2) Item relevance: SA therapists identified 96 items that were thematically coded according to their relationship to one another and were assigned to six domains; (3) Item utility: The ENACT-SA scale was piloted by rating recordings of psychological therapy sessions and stakeholder input; and (4) Psychometric properties: Internal consistency and inter-rater reliability of the final 12-item ENACT-SA were explored using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation co-efficient (ICC) for both clinical psychologists and registered counsellors.Although the original ENACT provided a framework for developing a tool for use in SA, several modifications were made to improve the applicability of the tool for the SA context, and optimise its adaptability other contexts. The adapted 12-item tool's internal consistency was good, while the inter-rater reliability was acceptable for both clinical psychologists and registered counsellors.The ENACT-SA is a reliable tool to assess common factors in psychological treatments. It is recommended that the tool be used in conjunction with assessment protocols and treatment-specific competency measures to fully assess implementation fidelity and potential mechanisms of therapeutic change.

Authors & Co-authors:  Spedding Maxine M Kohrt Brandon B Myers Bronwyn B Stein Dan J DJ Petersen Inge I Lund Crick C Sorsdahl Katherine K

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Ahn H and Wampold BE (2001) Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology 48, 251–257.
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1017/gmh.2022.40
SSN : 2054-4251
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Evidence-based psychosocial treatments;South Africa;therapist competencies
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
England