Supporting conservationists' mental health through better working conditions.

Journal: Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology

Volume: 37

Issue: 5

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Centre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore, India. Blue Ventures Conservation, Bristol, UK. Department of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK. Scientific Services Garden Route and Frontier Node, South African National Parks, George, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists' mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better understanding might help improve working conditions, supporting conservationists' job satisfaction, productivity, and engagement, while reducing costs from staff turnover, absenteeism, and presenteeism. We surveyed 2311 conservation professionals working in 122 countries through an internet survey shared via mailing lists, social media, and other channels. We asked them about experiences of psychological distress, working conditions, and personal characteristics. Over half were from and worked in Europe and North America, and most had a university-level education, were in desk-based academic and practitioner roles, and responded in English. Heavy workload, job demands, and organizational instability were linked to higher distress, but job stability and satisfaction with one's contributions to conservation were associated with lower distress. Respondents with low dispositional and conservation-specific optimism, poor physical health, and limited social support, women, and early-career professionals were most at risk of distress in our sample. Our results flag important risk factors that employers could consider, although further research is needed among groups underrepresented in our sample. Drawing on evidence-based occupational health interventions, we suggest measures that could promote better working conditions and thus may improve conservationists' mental health and abilities to protect nature.

Authors & Co-authors:  Pienkowski Thomas T Keane Aidan A Castelló Y Tickell Sofia S de Lange Emiel E Hazenbosch Mirjam M Khanyari Munib M Arlidge William N S WNS Baranyi Gergő G Brittain Stephanie S Kapoor Vena V Mohan Vik V Papworth Sarah S Ravi Roshni R Smit Izak P J IPJ Milner-Gulland E J EJ

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Albrecht, G., Sartore, G. M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., Stain, H., Tonna, A., & Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australasian Psychiatry, 15, S95-S98.
Authors :  15
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1111/cobi.14097
SSN : 1523-1739
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
ambientalistas;bienestar laboral;conservacionistas;conservation psychology;conservationists;environmentalists;estrés psicológico;mental health;occupational health;positive psychology;psicología de la conservación;psicología positiva;psychological distress;salud laboral;salud mental;workplace well-being;保护工作者;保护心理学;心理健康;心理压力;环保工作者;积极心理学;职业健康;职场健康
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States