Young people's data governance preferences for their mental health data: MindKind Study findings from India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom.

Journal: PloS one

Volume: 18

Issue: 4

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Human Centered Design and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom. Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, Maharashtra, India. Department of Psychiatry, Walter Sisulu University, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Activate Change Drivers ZA, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa. Nelson Mandela University, Gqeberha, Eastern Cape, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

Mobile devices offer a scalable opportunity to collect longitudinal data that facilitate advances in mental health treatment to address the burden of mental health conditions in young people. Sharing these data with the research community is critical to gaining maximal value from rich data of this nature. However, the highly personal nature of the data necessitates understanding the conditions under which young people are willing to share them. To answer this question, we developed the MindKind Study, a multinational, mixed methods study that solicits young people's preferences for how their data are governed and quantifies potential participants' willingness to join under different conditions. We employed a community-based participatory approach, involving young people as stakeholders and co-researchers. At sites in India, South Africa, and the UK, we enrolled 3575 participants ages 16-24 in the mobile app-mediated quantitative study and 143 participants in the public deliberation-based qualitative study. We found that while youth participants have strong preferences for data governance, these preferences did not translate into (un)willingness to join the smartphone-based study. Participants grappled with the risks and benefits of participation as well as their desire that the "right people" access their data. Throughout the study, we recognized young people's commitment to finding solutions and co-producing research architectures to allow for more open sharing of mental health data to accelerate and derive maximal benefit from research.

Authors & Co-authors:  Sieberts Solveig K SK Marten Carly C Bampton Emily E Björling Elin A EA Burn Anne-Marie AM Carey Emma Grace EG Carlson Sonia S Fernandes Blossom B Kalha Jasmine J Lindani Simthembile S Masomera Hedwick H Neelakantan Lakshmi L Pasquale Lisa L Ranganathan Swetha S Joy Scanlan Erin E Shah Himani H Sibisi Refiloe R Sumant Sushmita S Suver Christine C Thungana Yanga Y Tummalacherla Meghasyam M Velloza Jennifer J Collins Pamela Y PY Fazel Mina M Ford Tamsin T Freeman Melvyn M Pathare Soumitra S Zingela Zukiswa Z Doerr Megan M

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Jacquez F, Vaughn LM, Wagner E. Youth as Partners, Participants or Passive Recipients: A Review of Children and Adolescents in Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR). Am J Community Psychol. 2013. Mar 1;51(1):176–89. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9533-7
Authors :  30
Identifiers
Doi : e0279857
SSN : 1932-6203
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adolescent
Other Terms
Study Design
Longitudinal Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative,Mixed Methods
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
United States