A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Contingency Management for Substance Use Disorders in Low and Middle Income Countries.

Journal: International journal of behavioral medicine

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Wilshire Blvd., Suite , , Los Angeles, CA, US. mkalmin@mednet.ucla.edu. Department of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Department of Environmental Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North, CA, US. Department of Neuroscience, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Department of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles Wilshire Blvd., Suite , , Los Angeles, CA, US. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

The impact of illicit substance use is especially devastating in low-resourced countries where factors such as poverty, unemployment, and inadequate services impede successful treatment. Contingency management (CM) is a treatment for substance use disorders that has shown to be effective in eliciting behaviour change. The efficacy of CM interventions in low and middle income countries (LMICs) has been under explored.The aim of this systematic review of randomized controlled trials was to assess measures of CM efficacy in addressing substance use disorders, while also considering contextual moderators of CM in LMICs. A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library databases yielded 18 studies for inclusion, from which relevant data were extracted using modified versions of the Cochrane Characteristics of Studies tool.Two studies were located in a low-income country, two in lower-middle income countries, and fourteen in upper middle-income countries. Overall, estimated efficacy estimates were similar to those from higher income countries. However, context-specific challenges that warrant further investigation included limited access to trained staff and structural and financial constraints.While CM in LMICs is in its early stages of development, efficacy estimates were not substantially different compared to high income countries. Challenges such as costs, willingness to implement, and the stigma associated with addiction sets the stage for further research in these contexts.

Authors & Co-authors:  Kalmin Mariah M MM Nicolo Candice C Long Wahbie W Bodden David D Van Nunen Lara L Shoptaw Steven S Ipser Jonathan J

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  World Drug Report 2018. World Drug Report: UN. 2018.
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s12529-023-10197-8
SSN : 1532-7558
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Contingency management;Low and middle income countries;Substance use disorders;Substance use treatment
Study Design
Randomized Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England