Is it feasible to implement a community-based participatory group programme to address issues of access to healthcare for people with disabilities in Luuka district Uganda? A study protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 13

Issue: 9

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  International Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK hannah.kuper@lshtm.ac.uk. MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda. International Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Women and Children First, London, UK. School of Public Health, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda. Amref Health Africa in Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.

Abstract summary 

On average, people with disabilities face many difficulties in accessing healthcare and experience worse health outcomes. Yet, evidence on how to overcome these barriers is lacking. Participatory approaches are gaining prominence as they can generate low-cost, appropriate and scalable solutions. This study protocol is for the pilot testing of the co-created Participatory Learning and Action for Disability (PLA-D) groups to assess feasibility.We will pilot test PLA-D in five groups in Luuka district, Uganda during 2023. Each group will include approximately 20 members (people with disabilities, family members, carers) who will meet every 2-3 weeks over a 9-11 month period. The groups, guided by a trained facilitator, will identify issues about health and healthcare access and plan and implement locally generated solutions (eg, raising awareness of rights, advocacy and lobbying, establishing health savings and financing schemes). We will collect diverse sources of data to assess feasibility: (1) in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with group participants, non-participants and group facilitators; (2) monitoring of group activities; (3) direct observation of groups and (4) quantitative survey of group participants at baseline and endline. Data analyses will be undertaken to assess feasibility in terms of: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. We will develop and refine evaluation tools in preparation for a future trial.Ethical approval for the study has been received by the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and the Uganda Virus Research Institute ethics committees. Informed consent will be obtained from all study participants, making adaptations for people with disabilities as necessary. We will reach different groups for our dissemination activities, including (1) people with disabilities (eg, community meetings); (2) policy and programme stakeholders in Uganda and international (eg, individual meetings, evidence briefs) and (3) academics (journal articles, conference/seminar presentations).

Authors & Co-authors:  Kuper Hannah H Ssemata Andrew Sentoogo AS Smythe Tracey T Drazdzewska Joanna J Waiswa Peter P Kagurusi Patrick P Rosato Mikey M Mbazzi Femke Bannink FB

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  WHO . Global Report On Health Equity For Persons With Disabilities. Geneva: World Health Organzation, 2022.
Authors :  8
Identifiers
Doi : e074217
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Developmental neurology & neurodisability;Health Services Accessibility;MENTAL HEALTH
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England