Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a mental health self-management app in clinicians working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A pilot randomised controlled trial.

Journal: Psychiatry research

Volume: 329

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town , South Africa. The United States (US) Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), National Center for PTSD, Dissemination and Training Division, VA Palo Alto Health Care System; NCPTSD - ; Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA , United States. Biological Psychology, TU Dresden, Zellescher Weg , Dresden D - , Germany. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town , South Africa; South African Medical Research Council / Stellenbosch University Genomics of Brain Disorders Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town , South Africa; South African Medical Research Council / Stellenbosch University Genomics of Brain Disorders Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: llvdh@sun.ac.za.

Abstract summary 

COVID-19 affected the well-being of healthcare workers (HCWs) globally. Mental health app interventions (MHAIs) may offer appropriate and accessible means to support HCWs' mental health. We conducted a pilot randomised controlled crossover trial involving 34 clinicians randomised to either a MHAI or a waitlisted group. After one month, outcome assessments were repeated and the waitlisted group then crossed over to the MHAI; they again completed outcome assessments after a month. The primary outcomes were feasibility, assessed with the Systems Usability Scale (SUS), and acceptability, assessed with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). Secondary outcomes included efficacy for various mental health parameters. The SUS and CSQ scores indicated above average feasibility and acceptability. There was a significant difference in anxiety from baseline to 1-month follow-up between the groups, with greater improvement in the MHAI group. The groups differed in resilience and patient-related burnout from baseline to 1-month follow-up, with a trend towards significance, with greater improvements in the MHAI group. Anxiety and acute stress disorder severity improved significantly from pre- to post-intervention. We demonstrated that MHAIs hold potential for improving well-being of HCWs, although these findings will need to be replicated in adequately powered trials.

Authors & Co-authors:  Kirykowicz Katharine K Jaworski Beth B Owen Jason J Kirschbaum Clemens C Seedat Soraya S van den Heuvel Leigh Luella LL

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115493
SSN : 1872-7123
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Acute stress disorder;Anxiety;Burnout;COVID coach;Healthcare workers;Mobile app intervention;SARS-CoV-2
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Ireland