Ten simple rules for pushing boundaries of inclusion at academic events.

Journal: PLoS computational biology

Volume: 20

Issue: 3

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Independent Researcher, Cape Town, South Africa. Information Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America. Krembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Department of Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. ISYEB UMR Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, MNHN, SU, EPHE-PSL, UA. Botanique, Paris, France. SciLifeLab-Data Centre, Uppsala, Sweden. Institute of Science and Technology Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria. Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands. OLS (formerly Open Life Science), Wimblington, United Kingdom.

Abstract summary 

Inclusion at academic events is facing increased scrutiny as the communities these events serve raise their expectations for who can practically attend. Active efforts in recent years to bring more diversity to academic events have brought progress and created momentum. However, we must reflect on these efforts and determine which underrepresented groups are being disadvantaged. Inclusion at academic events is important to ensure diversity of discourse and opinion, to help build networks, and to avoid academic siloing. All of these contribute to the development of a robust and resilient academic field. We have developed these Ten Simple Rules both to amplify the voices that have been speaking out and to celebrate the progress of many Equity, Diversity, and Inclusivity practices that continue to drive the organisation of academic events. The Rules aim to raise awareness as well as provide actionable suggestions and tools to support these initiatives further. This aims to support academic organisations such as the Deep Learning Indaba, Neuromatch Academy, the IBRO-Simons Computational Neuroscience Imbizo, Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG), Arabs in Neuroscience, FAIRPoints, and OLS (formerly Open Life Science). This article is a call to action for organisers to reevaluate the impact and reach of their inclusive practices.

Authors & Co-authors:  Hall Siobhan Mackenzie SM Kochin Daniel D Carne Carmel C Herterich Patricia P Lewers Kristen Lenay KL Abdelhack Mohamed M Ramasubramanian Arun A Michael Alphonse Juno Felecia JF Ung Visotheary V El-Gebali Sara S Currin Christopher Brian CB Plomp Esther E Thompson Rachel R Sharan Malvika M

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Disability Visibility Project. Disability Visibility Project [Internet]. Disability Visibility Project. 2022. [cited 2023 Aug 7]. Available from: https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/
Authors :  14
Identifiers
Doi : e1011797
SSN : 1553-7358
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States