Prevalence and Health Impact of Intimate Partner Violence and Non-partner Sexual Violence Among Female Adolescents Aged 15-19 Years in Vulnerable Urban Environments: A Multi-Country Study.

Journal: The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine

Volume: 55

Issue: 6 Suppl

Year of Publication: 2015

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: mdecker@jhsph.edu. Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. Institute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan/University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Population Council, New Delhi, India. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan/University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai, China. Wits Reproductive Health & HIV Institute, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.

Abstract summary 

Globally, adolescent women are at risk for gender-based violence (GBV) including sexual violence and intimate partner violence (IPV). Those in economically distressed settings are considered uniquely vulnerable.Female adolescents aged 15-19 from Baltimore, Maryland, USA; New Delhi, India; Ibadan, Nigeria; Johannesburg, South Africa; and Shanghai, China (n = 1,112) were recruited via respondent-driven sampling to participate in a cross-sectional survey. We describe the prevalence of past-year physical and sexual IPV, and lifetime and past-year non-partner sexual violence. Logistic regression models evaluated associations of GBV with substance use, sexual and reproductive health, mental health, and self-rated health.Among ever-partnered women, past-year IPV prevalence ranged from 10.2% in Shanghai to 36.6% in Johannesburg. Lifetime non-partner sexual violence ranged from 1.2% in Shanghai to 12.6% in Johannesburg. Where sufficient cases allowed additional analyses (Baltimore and Johannesburg), both IPV and non-partner sexual violence were associated with poor health across domains of substance use, sexual and reproductive health, mental health, and self-rated health; associations varied across study sites.Significant heterogeneity was observed in the prevalence of IPV and non-partner sexual violence among adolescent women in economically distressed urban settings, with upwards of 25% of ever-partnered women experiencing past-year IPV in Baltimore, Ibadan, and Johannesburg, and more than 10% of adolescent women in Baltimore and Johannesburg reporting non-partner sexual violence. Findings affirm the negative health influence of GBV even in disadvantaged urban settings that present a range of competing health threats. A multisectoral response is needed to prevent GBV against young women, mitigate its health impact, and hold perpetrators accountable.

Authors & Co-authors:  Decker Michele R MR Peitzmeier Sarah S Olumide Adesola A Acharya Rajib R Ojengbede Oladosu O Covarrubias Laura L Gao Ersheng E Cheng Yan Y Delany-Moretlwe Sinead S Brahmbhatt Heena H

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  10
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.08.022
SSN : 1879-1972
Study Population
Women,Female
Mesh Terms
Adolescent
Other Terms
Adolescent;Intimate partner violence;Sexual violence
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Niger
Publication Country
United States