Hinge/floating craniotomy as an alternative technique for cerebral decompression: a scoping review.

Journal: Neurosurgical review

Volume: 43

Issue: 6

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Neurosurgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK. Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas University and Research Hospital, Milan, Italy. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. angeloskolias@gmail.com.

Abstract summary 

Hinge craniotomy (HC) is a technique that allows for a degree of decompression whilst retaining the bone flap in situ, in a 'floating' or 'hinged' fashion. This provides expansion potential for ensuing cerebral oedema whilst obviating the need for cranioplasty in the future. The exact indications, technique and outcomes of this procedure have yet to be determined, but it is likely that HC provides an alternative technique to decompressive craniectomy (DC) in certain contexts. The primary objective was to collate and describe the current evidence base for HC, including perioperative parameters, functional outcomes and complications. The secondary objective was to identify current nomenclature, operative technique and operative decision-making. A scoping review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR Checklist. Fifteen studies totalling 283 patients (mean age 45.1 and M:F 199:46) were included. There were 12 different terms for HC. The survival rate of the cohort was 74.6% (n = 211). Nine patients (3.2%) required subsequent formal DC. Six studies compared HC to DC following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, finding at least equivalent control of intracranial pressure (ICP). These studies also reported reduced rates of complications, including infection, in HC compared to DC. We have described the current evidence base of HC. There is no evidence of substantially worse outcomes compared to DC, although no randomised trials were identified. Eventually, a randomised trial will be useful to determine if HC should be offered as first-line treatment when indicated.

Authors & Co-authors:  Layard Horsfall Hugo H Mohan Midhun M Devi B Indira BI Adeleye Amos O AO Shukla Dhaval P DP Bhat Dhananjaya D Khan Mukhtar M Clark David J DJ Chari Aswin A Servadei Franco F Khan Tariq T Rubiano Andres M AM Hutchinson Peter J PJ Kolias Angelos G AG

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Dewan, M. C. et al. (2018) Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 1–18. 10.3171/2017.10.jns17352
Authors :  14
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s10143-019-01180-7
SSN : 1437-2320
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Other Terms
Decompressive craniectomy;Neurosurgery;Stroke;Traumatic brain injury
Study Design
Cohort Study,Case Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Germany