Transforming mental health systems globally: principles and policy recommendations.

Journal: Lancet (London, England)

Volume: 402

Issue: 10402

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: vikram_patel@hms.harvard.edu. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK; Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. Center for Global Mental Health Equity, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA. School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Global Mental Health Peer Network, Paarl, Cape Town, South Africa. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Fiji National University, Suva, Fiji. School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Orygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Abstract summary 

A burgeoning mental health crisis is emerging globally, regardless of each country's human resources or spending. We argue that effectively responding to this crisis is impeded by the dominant framing of mental ill health through the prism of diagnostic categories, leading to an excessive reliance on interventions that are delivered by specialists; a scarcity of widespread promotive, preventive, and recovery-oriented strategies; and failure to leverage diverse resources within communities. Drawing upon a series of syntheses, we identify five principles to transform current practices; namely, address harmful social environments across the life course, particularly in the early years; ensure that care is not contingent on a categorical diagnosis but aligned with the staging model of mental illness; empower diverse front-line providers to deliver psychosocial interventions; embrace a rights-based approach that seeks to provide alternatives to violence and coercion in care; and centre people with lived experience in all aspects of care. We recommend four policy actions which can transform these principles into reality: a whole of society approach to prevention and care; a redesign of the architecture of care delivery to provide a seamless continuum of care, tailored to the severity of the mental health condition; investing more in what works to enhance the impact and value of the investments; and ensuring accountability through monitoring and acting upon a set of mental health indicators. All these actions are achievable, relying-for the most part-on resources already available to every community and country. What they do require is the acceptance that business as usual will fail and the solutions to transforming mental health-care systems are already present within existing resources.

Authors & Co-authors:  Patel Vikram V Saxena Shekhar S Lund Crick C Kohrt Brandon B Kieling Christian C Sunkel Charlene C Kola Lola L Chang Odille O Charlson Fiona F O'Neill Kathryn K Herrman Helen H

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  11
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00918-2
SSN : 1474-547X
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England