Prevalence and acceptability of psychological and/or economic intimate partner violence, and utilization of mental health services by its survivors in Lithuania.

Journal: Journal of public health (Oxford, England)

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Comprehensive Health Research Centre/NOVA Medical School, National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Rua do Instituto Bacteriológico , Edifício Amarelo, - Lisboa, Portugal. Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NMS|FCM, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, - Lisboa, Portugal. Behavioural Lab LT, LT- Vilnius, Lithuania. Paris Institute for Advanced Study, Paris, France. Department of Psychological and Behavioural Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WCA AE, UK. Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Comprehensive Health Research Centre/NOVA Medical School, National School of Public Health, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, - Lisboa, Portugal. Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health, Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), Nova Medical School, Nova University of Lisbon, - Lisboa, Portugal.

Abstract summary 

Lithuania has one of the highest averages in the European Union when it comes to psychological and/or economic intimate partner violence (PE-IPV). IPV survivors are several times more likely to have mental health conditions than those without IPV experiences. The aim of this article is to study the prevalence, characteristics and attitudes of PE-IPV survivors in Lithuania, and the predictors of them accessing mental health services.A cross-sectional study based on a national survey representative of the adult population. The survey was implemented by a third-party independent market research company employing an online survey panel. Logistic regression models were used in the analysis.Almost 50% of women in Lithuania experience PE-IPV. Females are significantly more likely to experience it than males. The vast majority of women find PE-IPV unacceptable; however, only one-third of survivors seek any type of help. Only one-tenth approach mental health services, with divorcees being at higher odds of doing so.Further research is needed to explore predictors and contextual factors of why IPV survivors seek mental healthcare, or not. Policy implications include the need to eliminate IPV and mental health stigma; develop accessible mental health services and effective treatment approaches.

Authors & Co-authors:  Grigaitė Ugnė U Azeredo-Lopes Sofia S Žeimė Eglė E Slotkus Paulius Yamin PY Heitmayer Maxi M Aluh Deborah Oyine DO Pedrosa Bárbara B Silva Manuela M Santos-Dias Margarida M Cardoso Graça G Caldas-de-Almeida José Miguel JM

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  11
Identifiers
Doi : fdae015
SSN : 1741-3850
Study Population
Women,Females
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Lithuania;coercive control;mental health services;psychological and/or economic intimate partner violence
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England