Protective behaviours and secondary harms from non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 epidemic in South Africa: a multisite prospective longitudinal study.

Journal: medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. DIMAMO Population Health Research Centre, School of Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Limpopo, South Africa. DSI-MRC South African Population Research Infrastructure Network, South Africa.

Abstract summary 

In March 2020 South Africa implemented strict non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to contain Covid-19. Over the subsequent five months NPIs were eased in stages according to national strategy. Covid-19 spread throughout the country heterogeneously, reaching rural areas by July and peaking in July-August. Data on the impact of NPI policies on social and economic wellbeing and access to healthcare is limited. We therefore analysed how rural residents of three South African provinces changed their behaviour during the first epidemic wave.The South African Population Research Infrastructure Network (SAPRIN) nodes in Mpumalanga (Agincourt), KwaZulu-Natal (AHRI) and Limpopo (DIMAMO) provinces conducted longitudinal telephone surveys among randomly sampled households from rural and peri-urban surveillance populations every 2-3 weeks. Interviews included questions on: Covid-19 knowledge and behaviours; health and economic impact of NPIs; and mental health.2262 households completed 10,966 interviews between April and August 2020. By August, self-reported satisfaction with Covid-19 knowledge had risen from 48% to 85% and facemask use to over 95%. As selected NPIs were eased mobility increased, and economic losses and anxiety and depression symptoms fell. When Covid-19 cases spiked at one node in July, movement dropped rapidly, and missed daily medication rates doubled. Economic concerns and mental health symptoms were lower in households receiving a greater number of government-funded old-age pensions.South Africans reported complying with stringent Covid-19 NPIs despite the threat of substantial social, economic and health repercussions. Government-supported social welfare programmes appeared to buffer interruptions in income and healthcare access during local outbreaks. Epidemic control policies must be balanced against impacts on wellbeing in resource-limited settings and designed with parallel support systems where they threaten income and basic service access.

Authors & Co-authors:  Harling Guy G Gómez-Olivé Francesc Xavier FX Tlouyamma Joseph J Mutevedzi Tinofa T Kabudula Chodziwadziwa Whiteson CW Mahlako Ruth R Singh Urisha U Ohene-Kwofie Daniel D Buckland Rose R Ndagurwa Pedzisai P Gareta Dickman D Gunda Resign R Mngomezulu Thobeka T Nxumalo Siyabonga S Wong Emily B EB Kahn Kathleen K Siedner Mark J MJ Maimela Eric E Tollman Stephen S Collinson Mark M Herbst Kobus K

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Gilbert M, Pullano G, Pinotti F, Valdano E, Poletto C, Boelle PY, et al. Preparedness and vulnerability of African countries against importations of COVID-19: a modelling study. Lancet. 2020;395(10227):871–7.
Authors :  21
Identifiers
Doi : 2020.11.12.20230136
SSN : 
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Study Design
Longitudinal Study,Case Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
United States