Realist evaluation to improve health systems responsiveness to neglected health needs of vulnerable groups in Ghana and Vietnam: Study protocol.

Journal: PloS one

Volume: 16

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom. Department of Population and Reproductive Health, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam. Research and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana. Department of Undergraduate Education, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam. School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. Department of Quality Assurance, Institutional Care Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana. Mental Health Authority, Accra, Ghana. Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Abstract summary 

Socio-economic growth in many low and middle-income countries has resulted in more available, though not equitably accessible, healthcare. Such growth has also increased demands from citizens for their health systems to be more responsive to their needs. This paper shares a protocol for the RESPONSE study which aims to understand, co-produce, implement and evaluate context-sensitive interventions to improve health systems responsiveness to health needs of vulnerable groups in Ghana and Vietnam.We will use a realist mixed-methods theory-driven case study design, combining quantitative (household survey, secondary analysis of facility data) and qualitative (in-depth interviews, focus groups, observations and document and literature review) methods. Data will be analysed retroductively. The study will comprise three Phases. In Phase 1, we will understand actors' expectations of responsive health systems, identify key priorities for interventions, and using evidence from a realist synthesis we will develop an initial theory and generate a baseline data. In Phase 2, we will co-produce jointly with key actors, the context-sensitive interventions to improve health systems responsiveness. The interventions will seek to improve internal (i.e. intra-system) and external (i.e. people-systems) interactions through participatory workshops. In Phase 3, we will implement and evaluate the interventions by testing and refining our initial theory through comparing the intended design to the interventions' actual performance.The study's key outcomes will be: (1) improved health systems responsiveness, contributing to improved health services and ultimately health outcomes in Ghana and Vietnam and (2) an empirically-grounded and theoretically-informed model of complex contexts-mechanisms-outcomes relations, together with transferable best practices for scalability and generalisability. Decision-makers across different levels will be engaged throughout. Capacity strengthening will be underpinned by in-depth understanding of capacity needs and assets of each partner team, and will aim to strengthen individual, organisational and system level capacities.

Authors & Co-authors:  Mirzoev Tolib T Manzano Ana A Ha Bui Thi Thu BTT Agyepong Irene Akua IA Trang Do Thi Hanh DTH Danso-Appiah Anthony A Thi Le Minh LM Ashinyo Mary Eyram ME Vui Le Thi LT Gyimah Leveana L Chi Nguyen Thai Quynh NTQ Yevoo Lucy L Duong Doan Thi Thuy DTT Awini Elizabeth E Hicks Joseph Paul JP Cronin de Chavez Anna A Kane Sumit S

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  de Silva A. A framework for measuring responsiveness. GPE Discussion Paper series No 32. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
Authors :  17
Identifiers
Doi : e0245755
SSN : 1932-6203
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Ghana
Other Terms
Study Design
Case Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative
Country of Study
Ghana
Publication Country
United States