Protocol for a realist synthesis of health systems responsiveness in low-income and middle-income countries.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 11

Issue: 6

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK tolib.mirzoev@lshtm.ac.uk. Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Research and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Greater Accra, Ghana. Department of Quality Assurance, Institutional Care Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana. School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra-Legon, Ghana. Pantang Hospital, Mental Health Authority, Accra, Ghana. Department of Population and Reproductive Health, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam. Department of Environmental Health, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Viet Nam. Department of Health Promotion, Hanoi University of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam. Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne Queen's College, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract summary 

Health systems responsiveness is a key objective of any health system, yet it is the least studied of all objectives particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. Research on health systems responsiveness highlights its multiple elements, for example, dignity and confidentiality. Little is known, however, about underlying theories of health systems responsiveness, and the mechanisms through which responsiveness works. This realist synthesis contributes to bridging these two knowledge gaps.In this realist synthesis, we will use a four-step process, comprising: mapping of theoretical bases, formulation of programme theories, theory refinement and testing of programme theories using literature and empirical data from Ghana and Vietnam. We will include theoretical and conceptual pieces, reviews, empirical studies and grey literature, alongside the primary data. We will explore responsiveness as entailing external and internal interactions within health systems. The search strategy will be purposive and iterative, with continuous screening and refinement of theories. Data extraction will be combined with quality appraisal, using appropriate tools. Each fragment of evidence will be appraised as it is being extracted, for its relevance to the emerging programme theories and methodological rigour. The extracted data pertaining to contexts, mechanisms and outcomes will be synthesised to identify patterns and contradictions. Results will be reported using narrative explanations, following established guidance on realist syntheses.Ethics approvals for the wider RESPONSE (Improving health systems responsiveness to neglected health needs of vulnerable groups in Ghana and Vietnam) study, of which this review is one part, were obtained from the ethics committees of the following institutions: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (ref: 22981), University of Leeds, School of Medicine (ref: MREC19-051), Ghana Health Service (ref: GHS-ERC 012/03/20) and Hanoi University of Public Health (ref: 020-149/DD-YTCC).We will disseminate results through academic papers, conference presentations and stakeholder workshops in Ghana and Vietnam.CRD42020200353. Full record: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020200353.

Authors & Co-authors:  Mirzoev Tolib T Cronin de Chavez Anna A Manzano Ana A Agyepong Irene Akua IA Ashinyo Mary Eyram ME Danso-Appiah Anthony A Gyimah Leveana L Yevoo Lucy L Awini Elizabeth E Ha Bui Thi Thu BTT Do Thi Hanh Trang T Nguyen Quynh-Chi Thai QT Le Thi Minh TM Le Vui Thi VT Hicks Joseph Paul JP Wright Judy M JM Kane Sumit S

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  de Silva A. A framework for measuring responsiveness. GPE discussion paper series no 32. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
Authors :  17
Identifiers
Doi : e046992
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Developing Countries
Other Terms
international health services;organisation of health services;public health
Study Design
Narrative Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Ghana
Publication Country
England