Measurement of pregnancy-related anxiety worldwide: a systematic review.

Journal: BMC pregnancy and childbirth

Volume: 22

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Trinity Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. kristin.hadfield@tcd.ie. Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, USA. Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, England. Institute of Interdisciplinary Research, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana. Ghana Medical Help, Accra, Ghana. Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Trinity Centre for Global Health, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Department of Health Services, Policy, Planning, Management and Economics, School of Public Health, University for Development Studies, Tamale, Ghana.

Abstract summary 

The perinatal period is often characterized by specific fear, worry, and anxiety concerning the pregnancy and its outcomes, referred to as pregnancy-related anxiety. Pregnancy-related anxiety is uniquely associated with negative maternal and child health outcomes during pregnancy, at birth, and early childhood; as such, it is increasingly studied. We examined how pregnancy-related anxiety is measured, where measures were developed and validated, and where pregnancy-related anxiety has been assessed. We will use these factors to identify potential issues in measurement of pregnancy-related anxiety and the geographic gaps in this area of research.We searched the Africa-Wide, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO; PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO Citation Index, and ERIC databases for studies published at any point up to 01 August 2020 that assessed pregnancy-related anxiety. Search terms included pregnancy-related anxiety, pregnancy-related worry, prenatal anxiety, anxiety during pregnancy, and pregnancy-specific anxiety, among others. Inclusion criteria included: empirical research, published in English, and the inclusion of any assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety in a sample of pregnant women. This review is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020189938).The search identified 2904 records; after screening, we retained 352 full-text articles for consideration, ultimately including 269 studies in the review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. In total, 39 measures of pregnancy-related anxiety were used in these 269 papers, with 18 used in two or more studies. Less than 20% of the included studies (n = 44) reported research conducted in low- and middle-income country contexts. With one exception, all measures of pregnancy-related anxiety used in more than one study were developed in high-income country contexts. Only 13.8% validated the measures for use with a low- or middle-income country population.Together, these results suggest that pregnancy-related anxiety is being assessed frequently among pregnant people and in many countries, but often using tools that were developed in a context dissimilar to the participants' context and which have not been validated for the target population. Culturally relevant measures of pregnancy-related anxiety which are developed and validated in low-income countries are urgently needed.

Authors & Co-authors:  Hadfield Kristin K Akyirem Samuel S Sartori Luke L Abdul-Latif Abdul-Malik AM Akaateba Dominic D Bayrampour Hamideh H Daly Anna A Hadfield Kelly K Abiiro Gilbert Abotisem GA

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Dennis CL, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;210(5):315–323. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179.
Authors :  9
Identifiers
Doi : 331
SSN : 1471-2393
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Anxiety
Other Terms
Background;Cross-cultural;Maternal mental health;Measurement;Pregnancy;Pregnancy-related anxiety;Reliability and validity;Systematic review
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England