Psychosocial factors may serve as additional eligibility criteria for cardiovascular risk screening in women and men in a multi-ethnic population: The HELIUS study.

Journal: Preventive medicine

Volume: 172

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: b.hummel@amsterdamumc.nl. Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Public Health, Health Behaviours and Chronic Diseases, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Center of Research on Psychological Disorders and Somatic diseases (CoRPS), Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Abstract summary 

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention strategies include identifying and managing high risk individuals. Identification primarily occurs through screening or case finding. Guidelines indicate that psychosocial factors increase CVD risk, but their use for screening is not yet recommended. We studied whether psychosocial factors may serve as additional eligibility criteria in a multi-ethnic population without prior CVD. We performed a cross-sectional analysis using baseline data of 10,226 participants of Dutch, South-Asian Surinamese, African Surinamese, Ghanaian, Turkish and Moroccan origin aged 40-70 years, living in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Using logistic regressions and Akaike Information Criteria, we analyzed whether psychosocial factors (educational level, employment status, occupational level, financial stress, primary earner status, mental health, stress, depression, and social isolation) improved prediction of high CVD risk (SCORE-estimated fatal and non-fatal CVD risk ≥5%) beyond eligibility criteria from history taking (smoking, obesity, family history of CVD). Next, we compared the additional predictive value of psychosocial eligibility criteria in women and men across ethnic groups, using the area under the curve (AUC). Of our sample, 32.7% had a high CVD risk. Only socioeconomic eligibility criteria (employment status and educational level) improved high CVD risk prediction (p < .001 for likelihood-ratio tests). These increased AUCs in women (from 0.563 to 0.682) and men (from 0.610 to 0.664), particularly in Dutch, South-Asian Surinamese, African Surinamese and Moroccan women, and Dutch and Moroccan men. Concluding, socioeconomic eligibility criteria may be considered as additional eligibility criteria for CVD risk screening, as they improve detection of women and men at high CVD risk.

Authors & Co-authors:  Hummel Bryn B Harskamp Ralf E RE Bolijn Renee R Moll van Charante Eric P EP Galenkamp Henrike H Mommersteeg Paula M C PMC van Valkengoed Irene G M IGM

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107515
SSN : 1096-0260
Study Population
Men,Women,Male
Mesh Terms
Male
Other Terms
Cardiovascular risk management;Cardiovascular risk screening;Ethnic differences;Psychosocial risk factors;Sex differences;The HELIUS study
Study Design
Case Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Ghana
Publication Country
United States