Mutuality as a method: advancing a social paradigm for global mental health through mutual learning.

Journal: Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology

Volume: 59

Issue: 3

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  King's College London, London, UK. doerte.bemme@kcl.ac.uk. King's College London, London, UK. Kintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana. Rozaria Memorial Trust, Murewa, Zimbabwe. Centre for Mental Health Law & Policy, Pune, India. Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. University of Kwazulu-Natal, Centre for Rural Health, Durban, South Africa. Save the Children, New York, USA. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. University of Warwick, Coventry, UK. University College London, London, UK.

Abstract summary 

Calls for "mutuality" in global mental health (GMH) aim to produce knowledge more equitably across epistemic and power differences. With funding, convening, and publishing power still concentrated in institutions in the global North, efforts to decolonize GMH emphasize the need for mutual learning instead of unidirectional knowledge transfers. This article reflects on mutuality as a concept and practice that engenders sustainable relations, conceptual innovation, and queries how epistemic power can be shared.We draw on insights from an online mutual learning process over 8 months between 39 community-based and academic collaborators working in 24 countries. They came together to advance the shift towards a social paradigm in GMH.Our theorization of mutuality emphasizes that the processes and outcomes of knowledge production are inextricable. Mutual learning required an open-ended, iterative, and slower paced process that prioritized trust and remained responsive to all collaborators' needs and critiques. This resulted in a social paradigm that calls for GMH to (1) move from a deficit to a strength-based view of community mental health, (2) include local and experiential knowledge in scaling processes, (3) direct funding to community organizations, and (4) challenge concepts, such as trauma and resilience, through the lens of lived experience of communities in the global South.Under the current institutional arrangements in GMH, mutuality can only be imperfectly achieved. We present key ingredients of our partial success at mutual learning and conclude that challenging existing structural constraints is crucial to prevent a tokenistic use of the concept.

Authors & Co-authors:  Bemme Dörte D Roberts Tessa T Ae-Ngibise Kenneth A KA Gumbonzvanda Nyaradzayi N Joag Kaustubh K Kagee Ashraf A Machisa Mercilene M van der Westhuizen Claire C van Rensburg André A Willan Samantha S Wuerth Milena M Aoun May M Jain Sumeet S Lund Crick C Mathias Kaaren K Read Ursula U Taylor Salisbury Tatiana T Burgess Rochelle A RA

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Bemme D, D’souza NA. Global mental health and its discontents: an inquiry into the making of global and local scale. Transcult Psychiatry. 2014;51(6):850–874. doi: 10.1177/1363461514539830.
Authors :  18
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s00127-023-02493-1
SSN : 1433-9285
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Decolonizing knowledge;Epistemic justice;Global mental health;Mutual learning;Mutuality;Social determinants of mental health
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Germany