Scoping review of HIV-related intersectional stigma among sexual and gender minorities in sub-Saharan Africa.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 14

Issue: 2

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA debbie.dada@yale.edu. Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA. Medical Division, Military Hospital, Ghana Armed Forces, Accra, Ghana. Priorities on Rights and Sexual Health, Accra, Ghana. University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana. School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. St Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Behavioral, Sexual, and Global Health Lab, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA. Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Abstract summary 

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) are disproportionately impacted by HIV and often face multiple HIV-related stigmas. Addressing these stigmas could reduce SGM HIV vulnerability but little is known about how the stigmas operate and intersect. Intersectional stigma offers a lens for understanding the experiences of stigmatised populations and refers to the synergistic negative health effects of various systems of oppression on individuals with multiple stigmatised identities, behaviours or conditions. This review aims to (1) assess how often and in what ways an intersectional lens is applied in HIV-related stigma research on SGM populations in SSA and (2) understand how intersectional stigma impacts HIV risk in these populations.Scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews.Public health and regional databases were searched in 2020 and 2022.Articles in French and English on HIV-related stigma and HIV outcomes among men who have sex with men, women who have sex with women and/or transgender individuals in SSA.Articles were screened and extracted twice and categorised by use of an intersectional approach. Study designs and stigma types were described quantitatively and findings on intersectional stigma were thematically analysed.Of 173 articles on HIV-related stigma among SGM in SSA included in this review, 21 articles (12%) applied an intersectional lens. The most common intersectional stigmas investigated were HIV and same-sex attraction/behaviour stigma and HIV, same-sex attraction/behaviour and gender non-conformity stigma. Intersectional stigma drivers, facilitators and manifestations were identified across individual, interpersonal, institutional and societal socioecological levels. Intersectional stigma impacts HIV vulnerability by reducing HIV prevention and treatment service uptake, worsening mental health and increasing exposure to HIV risk factors.Intersectional approaches are gaining traction in stigma research among SGM in SSA. Future research should prioritise quantitative and mixed methods investigations, diverse populations and intervention evaluation.

Authors & Co-authors:  Dada Debbie D Abu-Ba'are Gamji R GR Turner DeAnne D Mashoud Ibrahim Wunpini IW Owusu-Dampare Francis F Apreku Amos A Ni Zhao Z Djiadeu Pascal P Aidoo-Frimpong Gloria G Zigah Edem Yaw EY Nyhan Kate K Nyblade Laura L Nelson LaRon E LE

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  UNAIDS . Global HIV & AIDS statistics — 2020 fact sheet. 2020. Available: https://www.unaids.org/en/resources/fact-sheet [Accessed 14 Mar 2021].
Authors :  13
Identifiers
Doi : e078794
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Men,Women,Male
Mesh Terms
Male
Other Terms
HIV & AIDS;MENTAL HEALTH;Sexual and Gender Minorities;Sexually Transmitted Disease;Transgender Persons
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative,Mixed Methods,Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England