Evaluating capacity-building for mental health system strengthening in low- and middle-income countries for service users and caregivers, service planners and researchers.

Journal: Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences

Volume: 27

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2018

Affiliated Institutions:  Addis Ababa University,College of Health Sciences,School of Medicine,Department of Psychiatry,Addis Ababa,Ethiopia. King's College London,Institute of Psychology,Psychiatry and Neuroscience,Health Service and Population Research Department,Centre for Global Mental Health,UK. Department of Psychiatry,WHO Collaborating Center for Research and Training in Mental Health,Neuroscience and Substance Abuse,University of Ibadan,Ibadan,Nigeria. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health,Alan J Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health,University of Cape Town,Cape Town,South Africa. King's College London,Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine,Academic Rheumatology,London,UK. Kyambogo University,Kampala,Uganda. Centre for Rural Health, College of Health Sciences,University of KwaZulu-Natal,South Africa. Centre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries,Public Health Foundation of India,New Delhi,India.

Abstract summary 

Efforts to support the scale-up of integrated mental health care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) need to focus on building human resource capacity in health system strengthening, as well as in the direct provision of mental health care. In a companion editorial, we describe a range of capacity-building activities that are being implemented by a multi-country research consortium (Emerald: Emerging mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries) for (1) service users and caregivers, (2) service planners and policy-makers and (3) researchers in six LMICs (Ethiopia, India, Nepal, Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda). In this paper, we focus on the methodology being used to evaluate the impact of capacity-building in these three target groups. We first review the evidence base for approaches to evaluation of capacity-building, highlighting the gaps in this area. We then describe the adaptation of best practice for the Emerald capacity-building evaluation. The resulting mixed method evaluation framework was tailored to each target group and to each country context. We identified a need to expand the evidence base on indicators of successful capacity-building across the different target groups. To address this, we developed an evaluation plan to measure the adequacy and usefulness of quantitative capacity-building indicators when compared with qualitative evaluation. We argue that evaluation needs to be an integral part of capacity-building activities and that expertise needs to be built in methods of evaluation. The Emerald evaluation provides a potential model for capacity-building evaluation across key stakeholder groups and promises to extend understanding of useful indicators of success.

Authors & Co-authors:  Hanlon C C Semrau M M Alem A A Abayneh S S Abdulmalik J J Docrat S S Evans-Lacko S S Gureje O O Jordans M M Lempp H H Mugisha J J Petersen I I Shidhaye R R Thornicroft G G

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Abayneh S, Lempp H, Alem A, Alemayehu D, Esehtu T, Lund C, Semrau M, Thornicroft G, Hanlon C (2017). Service user involvement in mental health system strengthening in a rural African setting: qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 17, 187. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1352-9.
Authors :  14
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1017/S2045796017000440
SSN : 2045-7960
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Capacity Building
Other Terms
Community mental health;global mental health;health service research;minority issues and cross cultural psychiatry;primary care;service user involvement;training
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative,Mixed Methods
Country of Study
Uganda
Publication Country
England