An evaluation of a common elements treatment approach for youth in Somali refugee camps.

Journal: Global mental health (Cambridge, England)

Volume: 5

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Mental Health and International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Global Community Mental Health Research Group, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Science, University of Macau, Macau (SAR), People's Republic of China. Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, Texas, USA. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Department of Social Policy and Intervention, Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. International Rescue Committee, IRC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Senior Technical Advisor, International Rescue Committee, New York, New York, USA.

Abstract summary 

This paper reports on: (1) an evaluation of a common elements treatment approach (CETA) developed for comorbid presentations of depression, anxiety, traumatic stress, and/or externalizing symptoms among children in three Somali refugee camps on the Ethiopian/Somali border, and (2) an evaluation of implementation factors from the perspective of staff, lay providers, and families who engaged in the intervention.This project was conducted in three refugee camps and utilized locally validated mental health instruments for internalizing, externalizing, and posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms. Participants were recruited from either a validity study or from referrals from social workers within International Rescue Committee Programs. Lay providers delivered CETA to youth (CETA-Youth) and families, and symptoms were re-assessed post-treatment. Providers and families responded to a semi-structured interview to assess implementation factors.Children who participated in the CETA-Youth open trial reported significant decreases in symptoms of internalizing (  =  1.37), externalizing (  =  0.85), and posttraumatic stress (  =  1.71), and improvements in well-being (  =  0.75). Caregivers also reported significant decreases in child symptoms. Qualitative results were positive toward the acceptability and appropriateness of treatment, and its feasibility.This project is the first to examine a common elements approach (CETA: defined as flexible delivery of elements, order, and dosing) with children and caregivers in a low-resource setting with delivery by lay providers. CETA-Youth may offer an effective treatment that is easier to implement and scale-up versus multiple focal interventions. A fullscale randomized clinical trial is warranted.

Authors & Co-authors:  Murray L K LK Hall B J BJ Dorsey S S Ugueto A M AM Puffer E S ES Sim A A Ismael A A Bass J J Akiba C C Lucid L L Harrison J J Erikson A A Bolton P A PA

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families: Burlington, VT.
Authors :  13
Identifiers
Doi : e16
SSN : 2054-4251
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
cognitive behavioral therapy;implementation science;interventions;refugee;transdiagnostic;youth
Study Design
Randomized Control Trial,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Qualitative
Country of Study
Mali
Publication Country
England