Lessons learned evaluating the baby friendly spaces program for south Sudanese refugees in Gambella, Ethiopia: strengthening research and programmatic partnerships to address maternal and child health and psychosocial needs in humanitarian emergencies.

Journal: Conflict and health

Volume: 14

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. Mental Health and Care Practices, Gender and Protection, Action Against Hunger, Addis Ababa/Gambella, Ethiopia. Mental Health and Care Practices, Gender and Protection, Action contre la Faim, - boulevard Douaumont, Paris, France.

Abstract summary 

During humanitarian crises, women and children are particularly vulnerable to morbidity and mortality. To address this problem, integrated child health interventions that include support for the well-being of mothers must be adapted and assessed in humanitarian settings. Baby Friendly Spaces (BFS) is a holistic program that aims to improve the health and wellbeing of pregnant and lactating women and their children under two years of age by providing psychosocial support and enhancing positive infant and young child-care practices. Using a mixed-methods, pre-post design, this study explored ways to strengthen the implementation and acceptability of the BFS program, and assess outcomes associated with participation among South Sudanese mothers and their children living in the Nguenyyiel refugee camp in Gambella, Ethiopia.A stronger evidence-base for integrated maternal and child health interventions, like BFS, in humanitarian emergencies is needed, but effectively conducting this type of research in unstable settings means encountering and working through myriad challenges. In this paper we discuss lessons learned while implementing this study, including, challenges related to ongoing local political and tribal conflicts and extreme conditions; implementation of a new digital data monitoring system; staff capacity building and turnover; and measurement were encountered. Strategies to mitigate such challenges included hiring and training new staff members. Regular weekly skype calls were held between Action Against Hunger Paris headquarters, the Action Against Hunger team in Gambella and Johns Hopkins' academic partners to follow study implementation progress and troubleshoot any emerging issues. Staff capacity building strategies included holding brief and focused trainings continuously throughout the study for both new and current staff members. Lastly, we engaged local Nuer staff members to help ensure study measures and interview questions were understandable among study participants.Research focused on strengthening program implementation is critically important for improving maternal and child health in humanitarian emergencies. Research in such settings demands critical problem-solving skills, strong supervision systems, flexibility in timeline and logistics, and tailor-made training for program and research staff members and context- adapted strategies for retaining existing staff.

Authors & Co-authors:  Lasater M E ME Woldeyes G M GM Le Roch K K Phan X X Solomon-Osborne A A Murray S M SM

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  UNHCR. Flooding across the border: A review of UNHCR’s response to the Sudanese refugee emergency in South Sudan. Geneva: UNHCR; 2013. PDES/2013/08. https://www.refworld.org/docid/51f626234.html.
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 52
SSN : 1752-1505
Study Population
Women,Mothers
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Breastfeeding;Child care practices;Ethiopia;Humanitarian emergencies;Process evaluation;Psychosocial support;Refugees
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Country of Study
Sudan
Publication Country
England