Assessing trauma and related distress in refugee youth and their caregivers: should we be concerned about iatrogenic effects?

Journal: European child & adolescent psychiatry

Volume: 30

Issue: 9

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, Haven Avenue, New York, NY, USA. Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. Research and Development, Region Kronoberg, Växjö, Sweden. Global and Community Mental Health Research Group, New York University (Shanghai), Century Avenue, Pudong New District, Shanghai, , People's Republic of China. brianhall@nyu.edu.

Abstract summary 

Assessment of potentially traumatic events and related psychological symptoms in refugee youth is common in epidemiological and intervention research. The objective of this study is to characterize reactions to assessments of trauma exposure and psychological symptoms, including traumatic stress, in refugee youth and their caregivers. Eighty-eight Somali youth and their caregivers participated in a screening and baseline interview for a psychological intervention in three refugee camps in Ethiopia. Participants were asked about their levels of distress prior to, immediately after, and approximately two weeks after completing the interview. Other quantitative and qualitative questions inquired about specific reactions to interview questions and procedures. Children and caregivers became increasingly relaxed over the course of the interview, on average. Few children (5.3%) or caregivers (6.5%) who reported being relaxed at the beginning of the interview became upset by the end of the interview. Some children and caregivers reported that certain assessment questions were upsetting and that feeling upset interfered with their activities. Despite some participants reporting persistent negative reactions, most reported liking and benefitting from the interview. While the majority of refugee youth and their caregivers reported positive experiences associated with completing trauma-related assessments, some reported negative reactions. Researchers and practitioners must consider the necessity, risks, and benefits of including questions about potentially traumatic events and related symptoms that are particularly upsetting in screening, survey research, and clinical assessment. When included, it is important that researchers and practitioners monitor negative reactions to these assessments and connect participants who become distressed with appropriate services.

Authors & Co-authors:  Greene M Claire MC Kane Jeremy C JC Bolton Paul P Murray Laura K LK Wainberg Milton L ML Yi Grace G Sim Amanda A Puffer Eve E Ismael Abdulkadir A Hall Brian J BJ

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  UNHCR (2019) Global trends: forced displacement in 2018. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Geneva
Authors :  10
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s00787-020-01635-z
SSN : 1435-165X
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adolescent
Other Terms
Adolescent;Caregivers;Child;Refugees;Survey and questionnaires;Trauma
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative
Country of Study
Mali
Publication Country
Germany