Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal: Systematic reviews

Volume: 11

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. abebaw.fekadu@aau.edu.et. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. School of Psychology, College of Education and Behavioral Studies, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Centre for Rural Health, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA, USA. Center for Affective Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. King's Global Health Institute, King's College London, NE Wing Bush House, Aldwych, London, WCB BJ, UK. Centre for Global Mental Health, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE AF, UK.

Abstract summary 

Depression is one of the commonest mental disorders in primary care but is poorly identified. The objective of this review was to determine the level of detection of depression by primary care clinicians and its determinants in studies from low- to middle-income countries (LMICs).A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILAC, and AJOL with no restriction of year of publication. Risk of bias within studies was evaluated with the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP). "Gold standard" diagnosis for the purposes of this review was based on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; cutoff scores of 5 and 10), other standard questionnaires and interview scales or expert diagnosis. Meta-analysis was conducted excluding studies on special populations. Analyses of pooled data were stratified by diagnostic approaches.A total of 3159 non-duplicate publications were screened. Nine publications, 2 multi-country studies, and 7 single-country studies, making 12 country-level reports, were included. Overall methodological quality of the studies was good. Depression detection was 0.0% in four of the twelve reports and < 12% in another five. PHQ-9 was the main tool used: the pooled detection in two reports that used PHQ-9 at a cutoff point of 5 (combined sample size = 1426) was 3.9% (95% CI = 2.3%, 5.5%); in four reports that used PHQ-9 cutoff score of 10 (combined sample size = 5481), the pooled detection was 7.0% (95% CI = 3.9%, 10.2%). Severity of depression and suicidality were significantly associated with detection.While the use of screening tools is an important limitation, the extremely low detection of depression by primary care clinicians poses a serious threat to scaling up mental healthcare in LMICs. Interventions to improve detection should be prioritized.PROSPERO CRD42016039704 .

Authors & Co-authors:  Fekadu Abebaw A Demissie Mekdes M Birhane Rahel R Medhin Girmay G Bitew Tesera T Hailemariam Maji M Minaye Abebaw A Habtamu Kassahun K Milkias Barkot B Petersen Inge I Patel Vikram V Cleare Anthony J AJ Mayston Rosie R Thornicroft Graham G Alem Atalay A Hanlon Charlotte C Prince Martin M

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Villoro R, Merino M, Hidalgo-Vega A. Quality of life and use of health care resources among patients with chronic depression. Patient Relat Outcome Measures. 2016;7:145–155. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S101595.
Authors :  17
Identifiers
Doi : 21
SSN : 2046-4053
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Depression
Other Terms
Depression;Detection;Low and middle-income countries;Primary health care;Review
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England