Effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation delivery modes on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in heart failure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Journal: Open heart

Volume: 9

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2022

Affiliated Institutions:  Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia kteketo@yahoo.com. Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract summary 

This review aimed to compare the relative effectiveness of different exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) delivery modes (centre-based, home-based, hybrid and technology-enabled ExCR) on key heart failure (HF) outcomes: exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), HF-related hospitalisation and HF-related mortality.Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published through 20 June 2021 were identified from six databases, and reference lists of included studies. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated using the Cochrane tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, respectively. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using R. Continuous and binary outcomes are reported as mean differences (MD) and ORs, respectively, with 95% credible intervals (95% CrI). One-hundred and thirty-nine RCTs (n=18 670) were included in the analysis. Network meta-analysis demonstrated improvements in VOpeak following centre-based (MD (95% CrI)=3.10 (2.56 to 3.65) mL/kg/min), home-based (MD=2.69 (1.67 to 3.70) mL/kg/min) and technology-enabled ExCR (MD=1.76 (0.27 to 3.26) mL/kg/min). Similarly, 6 min walk distance was improved following hybrid (MD=84.78 (31.64 to 138.32) m), centre-based (MD=50.35 (30.15 to 70.56) m) and home-based ExCR (MD=36.77 (12.47 to 61.29) m). Incremental shuttle walk distance did not improve following any ExCR delivery modes. Minnesota living with HF questionnaire improved after centre-based (MD=-10.38 (-14.15 to -6.46)) and home-based ExCR (MD=-8.80 (-13.62 to -4.07)). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire was improved following home-based ExCR (MD=20.61 (4.61 to 36.47)), and Short Form Survey 36 mental component after centre-based ExCR (MD=3.64 (0.30 to 6.14)). HF-related hospitalisation and mortality risks reduced only after centre-based ExCR (OR=0.41 (0.17 to 0.76) and OR=0.42 (0.16 to 0.90), respectively). Mean age of study participants was only associated with changes in VOpeak.ExCR programmes have broader benefits for people with HF and since different delivery modes were comparably effective for improving exercise capacity and HRQoL, the selection of delivery modes should be tailored to individuals' preferences.

Authors & Co-authors:  Tegegne Teketo Kassaw TK Rawstorn Jonathan C JC Nourse Rebecca Amy RA Kibret Kelemu Tilahun KT Ahmed Kedir Yimam KY Maddison Ralph R

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Braunwald E. The war against heart failure: the Lancet lecture. Lancet 2015;385:812–24. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61889-4
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : e001949
SSN : 2053-3624
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Cardiac Rehabilitation
Other Terms
cardiac rehabilitation;epidemiology;heart failure;meta-analysis;outcome assessment, health care
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England