Successes and challenges towards improving quality of primary health care services: a scoping review.

Journal: BMC health services research

Volume: 23

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  School of Public Health, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. yaklilu@gmail.com. School of Public Health, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. International Institute for Primary Health Care in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Abstract summary 

Quality health services build communities' and patients' trust in health care. It enhances the acceptability of services and increases health service coverage. Quality primary health care is imperative for universal health coverage through expanding health institutions and increasing skilled health professionals to deliver services near to people. Evidence on the quality of health system inputs, interactions between health personnel and clients, and outcomes of health care interventions is necessary. This review summarised indicators, successes, and challenges of the quality of primary health care services.We used the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis extensions for scoping reviews to guide the article selection process. A systematic search of literature from PubMed, Web of Science, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted on August 23, 2022, but the preliminary search was begun on July 5, 2022. The Donabedian's quality of care framework, consisting of structure, process and outcomes, was used to operationalise and synthesise the findings on the quality of primary health care.Human resources for health, law and policy, infrastructure and facilities, and resources were the common structure indicators. Diagnosis (health assessment and/or laboratory tests) and management (health information, education, and treatment) procedures were the process indicators. Clinical outcomes (cure, mortality, treatment completion), behaviour change, and satisfaction were the common indicators of outcome. Lower cause-specific mortality and a lower rate of hospitalisation in high-income countries were successes, while high mortality due to tuberculosis and the geographical disparity in quality care were challenges in developing countries. There also exist challenges in developed countries (e.g., poor quality mental health care due to a high admission rate). Shortage of health workers was a challenge both in developed and developing countries.Quality of care indicators varied according to the health care problems, which resulted in a disparity in the successes and challenges across countries around the world. Initiatives to improve the quality of primary health care services should ensure the availability of adequate health care providers, equipped health care facilities, appropriate financing mechanisms, enhance compliance with health policy and laws, as well as community and client participation. Additionally, each country should be proactive in monitoring and evaluation of performance indicators in each dimension (structure, process, and outcome) of quality of primary health care services.

Authors & Co-authors:  Endalamaw Aklilu A Khatri Resham B RB Erku Daniel D Nigatu Frehiwot F Zewdie Anteneh A Wolka Eskinder E Assefa Yibeltal Y

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Chassin M, Galvin R, Angel K, Angell M, Berenson R, Brook R et al. Measuring the quality of health care: A statement by the national roundtable on health care quality. Washington, DC: National Academy Press Chesla, C(2008) Translational research: Essential contributions from interpretive nursing science Research in Nursing & Health. 1999;31(4):381 – 90.
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : 893
SSN : 1472-6963
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Donabedian model;Primary health care;Quality
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
England