Impacts of Covid-19 on mental health service provision in the Western Cape, South Africa: The MASC study.

Journal: PloS one

Volume: 18

Issue: 8

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Alan J. Flisher Centre for Public Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry & Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa. Cape Mental Health, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa. Western Cape Department of Health, Western Cape Province, South Africa. Department of Psychiatry & Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa. Centre for Global Mental Health, Health Service and Population Research Department, and WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Research and Training, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Centre for Global Mental Health and Centre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England.

Abstract summary 

In the context of an already large treatment gap in South Africa, this study aimed to examine how Covid-19 and the related lockdown measures affected the availability, accessibility, quality, and continuity of mental health services in the Western Cape province in South Africa. A mixed-methods design was employed, using narrative surveys, quantitative surveys, and qualitative semi-structured interviews, with 17 public mental health providers, and secondary data from the District Health Information System. We analysed and combined the data using descriptive statistics, template analysis and methodological triangulation. Results showed that Covid-19 and the lockdowns had negative impacts on mental health service provision at all levels of care, such as reduced access to services, increased stigma and discrimination, disrupted medication supply, increased workload and stress for providers, and the closure of psychosocial and therapeutic services. Innovations used by providers to mitigate these impacts included telehealth, online training, peer support groups, and community outreach. The study concludes that Covid-19 and the lockdowns exposed and exacerbated the existing gaps and challenges in mental health service provision in South Africa. Key recommendations for policy formation and response to future pandemics in the public mental health sector include: classifying psychological treatments as essential services, establishing an intersectoral mental health emergency response plan, involving mental health care users in the development of pandemic responses, creating policies for managing health emergencies in psychiatric facilities, and increasing resources for the mental health sector in South Africa. These recommendations are relevant for South Africa and other LMICs in ensuring adequate mental health care during public health emergencies.

Authors & Co-authors:  Davies Thandi T Daniels Ingrid I Roelofse Marinda M Dean Carol C Parker John J Hanlon Charlotte C Thornicroft Graham G Sorsdahl Katherine K

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Herman AA, Stein DJ, Seedat S, Heeringa SG, Moomal H, Williams DR. The South African Stress and Health (SASH) study: 12-month and lifetime prevalence of common mental disorders. S Afr Med J. 2009;99(5 Pt 2):339–44.
Authors :  8
Identifiers
Doi : e0290712
SSN : 1932-6203
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Study Design
Narrative Study,Descriptive Study,Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative
Country of Study
South Africa
Publication Country
United States