Neuroimaging findings in headache with normal neurologic examination: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Journal: Journal of the neurological sciences

Volume: 416

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Electronic address: kamtchum@ualberta.ca. Service de Radiologie et Imagerie Médicale, Département de Biologie et Explorations Fonctionnelles, Faculté de Médecine, de Pharmacie et d'Odontostomatologie, Université Cheick Anta Diop, Dakar, Senegal. Neuropsychiatry Department, Bafoussam Regional Hospital, Bafoussam, Cameroon. Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, Canada. Department of Internal Medicine and Specialties, Faculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon. Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.

Abstract summary 

To determine if pooled estimates of the prevalence of unexpected findings in patients with headache and normal neurologic examination support current expert opinion-based neuroimaging guidelines.We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies reporting neuroimaging findings in patients with headache and normal neurologic examination up to September 30, 2017. The overall and disease-specific prevalence of unexpected findings were pooled through random-effects meta-analysis. This study is registered with PROSPERO, registration number CRD42017079714.In forty-one studies including 15,760 participants, the overall prevalence of unexpected findings and normal variants was 17.5% (95% CI: 13.1-22.3). The prevalence was 26.6% (95% CI: 15.5-39.4) in studies using MRI only. The prevalence of vascular, neoplastic, and non-neoplastic findings was 6.6%, 1.4%, and 9.6%. The pooled disease-specific prevalence was 2.0% for stroke, 1.8% for aneurysms, 0.8% for subdural hematoma, 0.7% for hydrocephalus, 0.2% for glioma, and 0.1% for meningioma. In secondary analysis, there was 0.4% increase in the prevalence of vascular unexpected findings with each 1% increase in the proportion of migraine with aura (p-value for meta-regression = 0.005).In patients with headache and normal neurologic examination, important vascular and neoplastic unexpected findings are rare and better detected with MRI. This supports current American College of Radiology and European Headache Federation recommendations to avoid systematic imaging in such patients and prefer MRI when imaging is needed.

Authors & Co-authors:  Kamtchum-Tatuene Joseph J Kenteu Bernold B Fogang Yannick F YF Zafack Joseline G JG Nyaga Ulrich Flore UF Noubiap Jean Jacques JJ

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116997
SSN : 1878-5883
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Headache
Other Terms
CT;Headache;Incidental findings;MRI;Migraine;Normal variants
Study Design
Cross Sectional Study
Study Approach
Systemic Review
Country of Study
Publication Country
Netherlands