From the international tobacco control arena to the local context: a qualitative study on the tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship legislative environment in Sudan and the challenges characterising it.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 13

Issue: 6

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK at@bath.ac.uk. School of Psychology, Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Department of Community, Environmental, and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Indonesia. Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Abstract summary 

The aim of the study was to assess the Sudanese tobacco advertising, promotion and sponsorship (TAPS) legislative environment and the challenges characterising it. We formulated three research questions: What is the TAPS policy context in Sudan? What circumstances led to the development of the current legislative text? Finally, what was the involvement of the different actors in these events?We conducted a qualitative analysis using the Health Policy Triangle model to frame the collection and extraction of publicly available information from academic literature search engines, news media databases or websites of national and international organisations, as published by February 2021. The thematic framework approach was employed to code and analyse the textual data and the generated themes were used to map connections across the data and to explore relationships among the generated subthemes and themes.Sudan.Using a combination of the keywords "Sudan" and "tobacco advertising" (or "tobacco marketing" or "tobacco promotion"), we collected publicly available documents in the English language. We included 29 documents in the analysis.Three themes underpin the Sudanese legislative environment on TAPS: (1) limited and outdated TAPS data, (2) stakeholder involvement and tobacco industry interference and (3) TAPS legislation not aligned with the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control Secretariat recommendations.Findings from this qualitative analysis suggest that recommendations to move forward in Sudan should include the systematic and periodic collection of TAPS surveillance data, addressing any remaining legislative content loopholes and protecting policy-making from tobacco industry interference. In addition, best practices from other low-income and middle-income countries with good TAPS monitoring systems, such as Egypt, Bangladesh and Indonesia, or with protective provisions against tobacco industry interference, such as Thailand and the Philippines, could be considered for adaptation and implementation.

Authors & Co-authors:  Tselengidis Arsenios A Adams Sally S Freeman Becky B Mostafa Aya A Astuti Putu Ayu Swandewi PAS Cranwell Jo J

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  World Health Organization . WHO framework convention on tobacco control. Geneva, Available: https://fctc.who.int/publications/i/item/9241591013 [Accessed 01 Jul 2021].
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : e066528
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Health policy;PUBLIC HEALTH;QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Study Design
Study Approach
Qualitative
Country of Study
Sudan
Publication Country
England