Decompressive craniotomy: an international survey of practice.

Journal: Acta neurochirurgica

Volume: 163

Issue: 5

Year of Publication: 2021

Affiliated Institutions:  Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box , Cambridge, CB QQ, UK. mm@cam.ac.uk. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box , Cambridge, CB QQ, UK. Department of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Humanitas Clinical and Research Center- IRCCS, Milan, Italy. Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Rwanda Military Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.

Abstract summary 

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke have devastating consequences and are major global public health issues. For patients that require a cerebral decompression after suffering a TBI or stroke, a decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the most commonly performed operation. However, retrospective non-randomized studies suggest that a decompressive craniotomy (DCO; also known as hinge or floating craniotomy), where a bone flap is replaced but not rigidly fixed, has comparable outcomes to DC. The primary aim of this project was to understand the current extent of usage of DC and DCO for TBI and stroke worldwide.A questionnaire was designed and disseminated globally via emailing lists and social media to practicing neurosurgeons between June and November 2019.We received 208 responses from 60 countries [40 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)]. DC is used more frequently than DCO, however, about one-quarter of respondents are using a DCO in more than 25% of their patients. The three top indications for a DCO were an acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) and a GCS of 9-12, ASDH with contusions and a GCS of 3-8, and ASDH with contusions and a GCS of 9-12. There were 8 DCO techniques used with the majority (60/125) loosely tying sutures to the bone flap. The majority (82%) stated that they were interested in collaborating on a randomized trial of DCO vs. DC.Our results show that DCO is a procedure carried out for TBI and stroke, especially in LMICs, and most commonly for an ASDH. The majority of the respondents were interested in collaborating on a is a future randomized trial.

Authors & Co-authors:  Mohan Midhun M Layard Horsfall Hugo H Solla Davi Jorge Fontoura DJF Robertson Faith C FC Adeleye Amos O AO Teklemariam Tsegazeab Laeke TL Khan Muhammad Mukhtar MM Servadei Franco F Khan Tariq T Karekezi Claire C Rubiano Andres M AM Hutchinson Peter J PJ Paiva Wellingson Silva WS Kolias Angelos G AG Devi B Indira BI

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Adeleye AO, Azeez AL. Decompressive craniectomy bone flap hinged on the temporalis muscle: a new inexpensive use for an old neurosurgical technique. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:150. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.86227.
Authors :  16
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s00701-021-04783-6
SSN : 0942-0940
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adult
Other Terms
Decompressive craniectomy;Decompressive craniotomy;Floating craniotomy;Hinge craniotomy;Neurosurgery;Stroke;Traumatic brain injury
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Austria