Core concepts of human rights and inclusion of vulnerable groups in the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudan.

Journal: International journal of mental health systems

Volume: 7

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2013

Affiliated Institutions:  Centre for Global Health & School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland, and Centre for Rehabilitation Studies, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. malcolm.maclachlan@tcd.ie.

Abstract summary 

One of the most crucial steps towards delivering judicious and comprehensive mental health care is the formulation of a policy and plan that will navigate mental health systems. For policy-makers, the challenges of a high-quality mental health system are considerable: the provision of mental health services to all who need them, in an equitable way, in a mode that promotes human rights and health outcomes.EquiFrame, a novel policy analysis framework, was used to evaluate the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudan. The health policies were assessed in terms of their coverage of 21 predefined Core Concepts of human rights (Core Concept Coverage), their stated quality of commitment to said Core Concepts (Core Concept Quality), and their inclusion of 12 Vulnerable Groups (Vulnerable Group Coverage). In relation to these summary indices, each policy was also assigned an Overall Summary Ranking, in terms of it being of High, Moderate, or Low quality.Substantial variability was identified across EquiFrame's summary indices for the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudan. However, all three mental health policies scored high on Core Concept Coverage. Particularly noteworthy was the Sudanese policy, which scored 86% on Core Concept Coverage, and 92% on Vulnerable Group Coverage. Particular deficits were evident in the Malawian mental health policy, which scored 33% on Vulnerable Group Coverage and 47% on Core Concept Quality, and was assigned an Overall Summary Ranking of Low accordingly. The Overall Summary Ranking for the Namibian Mental Health Policy was High; for the Sudanese Mental Health Policy was Moderate; and for the Malawian Mental Health Policy was Low.If human rights and equity underpin policy formation, it is more likely that they will be inculcated in health service delivery. EquiFrame may provide a novel and valuable tool for mental health policy analysis in relation to core concepts of human rights and inclusion of vulnerable groups, a key practical step in the successful realization of the Millennium Development Goals.

Authors & Co-authors:  Mannan Hasheem H Eltayeb Shahla S Maclachlan Malcolm M Amin Mutamad M McVeigh Joanne J Munthali Alister A Van Rooy Gert G

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  World Health Organization. Improving health systems and services for mental health. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241598774_eng.pdf.
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1186/1752-4458-7-7
SSN : 1752-4458
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Namibia
Publication Country
England