Stigma in health facilities: why it matters and how we can change it.

Journal: BMC medicine

Volume: 17

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2019

Affiliated Institutions:  RTI International, th ST NW, Suite , Washington, DC, USA. lnyblade@rti.org. Epidemiology Department, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #, Chapel Hill, NC, , USA. RTI International, th ST NW, Suite , Washington, DC, USA. Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Division of Prevention Science, University of California, San Francisco, th Street, rd Floor, San Francisco, CA, -, USA. Health Economics Unit, Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago. International Institute for Social Studies, Erasmus University, Kortenaerkade , AX, The Hague, Netherlands. University of Rochester School of Nursing, Elmwood Avenue, Box SON, Rochester, NY, , USA. Departments of Public Health and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health of the Government of Thailand, Tivanond Road, Nonthaburi, , Thailand. Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, Maternal and Child Health Concentration, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA. Centre for Longitudinal & Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Sint-Jacobstraat , B-, Antwerp, Belgium.

Abstract summary 

Stigma in health facilities undermines diagnosis, treatment, and successful health outcomes. Addressing stigma is fundamental to delivering quality healthcare and achieving optimal health. This correspondence article seeks to assess how developments over the past 5 years have contributed to the state of programmatic knowledge-both approaches and methods-regarding interventions to reduce stigma in health facilities, and explores the potential to concurrently address multiple health condition stigmas. It is supported by findings from a systematic review of published articles indexed in PubMed, Psychinfo and Web of Science, and in the United States Agency for International Development's Development Experience Clearinghouse, which was conducted in February 2018 and restricted to the past 5 years. Forty-two studies met inclusion criteria and provided insight on interventions to reduce HIV, mental illness, or substance abuse stigma. Multiple common approaches to address stigma in health facilities emerged, which were implemented in a variety of ways. The literature search identified key gaps including a dearth of stigma reduction interventions in health facilities that focus on tuberculosis, diabetes, leprosy, or cancer; target multiple cadres of staff or multiple ecological levels; leverage interactive technology; or address stigma experienced by health workers. Preliminary results from ongoing innovative responses to these gaps are also described.The current evidence base of stigma reduction in health facilities provides a solid foundation to develop and implement interventions. However, gaps exist and merit further work. Future investment in health facility stigma reduction should prioritize the involvement of clients living with the stigmatized condition or behavior and health workers living with stigmatized conditions and should address both individual and structural level stigma.

Authors & Co-authors:  Nyblade Laura L Stockton Melissa A MA Giger Kayla K Bond Virginia V Ekstrand Maria L ML Lean Roger Mc RM Mitchell Ellen M H EMH Nelson La Ron E RE Sapag Jaime C JC Siraprapasiri Taweesap T Turan Janet J Wouters Edwin E

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Link BG, Phelan JC. Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Soc. 2001;27(1):363–85.
Authors :  12
Identifiers
Doi : 25
SSN : 1741-7015
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Health Facilities
Other Terms
Discrimination;Health facilities;Intervention;Programs;Reduction;Stigma
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England