Abstract summary 

The effectiveness of the testimony method has not been established in rural communities with survivors of prolonged civil war.To examine the effectiveness and feasibility of a testimony method to ameliorate post-traumatic stress symptoms.Participants (n=206) belonged to former war zones in Mozambique. They were divided into a case (n=137) and a non-case group (n=69). The case group was randomly divided into an intervention (n=66) and a control group (n=71). Symptoms were measured during baseline assessment, post-intervention and at an 11-month follow-up.Post-intervention measurements demonstrated significant symptom reduction in both the intervention and the control group. No significant differences were found between the intervention and the control group. Follow-up measurements showed sustained lower levels of symptoms in both groups, and some indications of a positive intervention effect in women.A remarkable drop in symptoms could not be linked directly to the intervention. Feasibility of the intervention was good, but controlling the intervention in a small rural community appeared to be a difficult task to accomplish.

Authors & Co-authors:  Igreja Victor V Kleijn Wim C WC Schreuder Bas J N BJ Van Dijk Janie A JA Verschuur Margot M

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source