The Effect of Psychological First Aid Training on Knowledge and Understanding about Psychosocial Support Principles: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Journal: International journal of environmental research and public health

Volume: 17

Issue: 2

Year of Publication: 2020

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit, BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Institute for Global Health and Development, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh EH UU, UK. Department of Counselling Psychology, University of Makeni, Freetown, Makeni PO Box , Northern Province, Sierra Leone. ARQ International, ARQ National Psychotrauma Centre, XE Diemen, The Netherlands. International Medical Relief Services (IMRES), AE Lelystad, The Netherlands. Amsterdam University Medical Centre, HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract summary 

Psychological first aid (PFA) is a world-wide implemented approach to helping people affected by an emergency, disaster, or other adverse event. Controlled evaluations of PFA's training effects are lacking. We evaluated the effectiveness of a one-day PFA training on the acquisition and retention of knowledge of appropriate responses and skills in the acute aftermath of adversity in Peripheral Health Units (PHUs) in post-Ebola Sierra Leone. Secondary outcomes were professional quality of life, confidence in supporting a distressed person, and professional attitude. PHUs in Sierra Leone ( = 129) were cluster-randomized across PFA (206 participants) and control (202 participants) in March 2017. Knowledge and understanding of psychosocial support principles and skills were measured with a questionnaire and two patient scenarios to which participants described helpful responses. Professional attitude, confidence, and professional quality of life were assessed using self-report instruments. Assessments took place at baseline and at three- and six-months post-baseline. The PFA group had a stronger increase in PFA knowledge and understanding at the post-PFA training assessment (d = 0.50; < 0.001) and at follow-up (d = 0.43; = 0.001). In addition, the PFA group showed better responses to the scenarios at six-months follow-up (d = 0.38; = 0.0002) but not at the post-assessment (d = 0.04; = 0.26). No overall significant differences were found for professional attitude, confidence, and professional quality of life. In conclusion, PFA training improved acquisition and retention of knowledge and understanding of appropriate psychosocial responses and skills in providing support to individuals exposed to acute adversity. Our data support the use of PFA trainings to strengthen capacity for psychosocial support in contexts of disaster and humanitarian crisis. Future studies should examine the effects of PFA on psychosocial outcomes for people affected by crises.

Authors & Co-authors:  Sijbrandij Horn Esliker O'May Reiffers Ruttenberg Stam de Jong Ager

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Ruzek J.I., Brymer M.J., Jacobs A.K., Layne C.M., Vernberg E.M., Watson P.J. Psychological First Aid. J. Ment. Health Couns. 2007;29:17–49. doi: 10.17744/mehc.29.1.5racqxjueafabgwp.
Authors :  9
Identifiers
Doi : 484
SSN : 1660-4601
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Adult
Other Terms
humanitarian assistance;mental health and psychosocial support;prevention;psychological first aid;randomized controlled trial;training classification
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Sierra leone
Publication Country
Switzerland