Knowledge mobilization activities to support decision-making by youth, parents, and adults using a systematic and living map of evidence and recommendations on COVID-19: protocol for three randomized controlled trials and qualitative user-experience studies.

Journal: Trials

Volume: 24

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2023

Affiliated Institutions:  Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, LS K, Canada. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. Five Labs Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Departments of Science and International Studies, St. Elizabeth University of Public Health and Social Science, Bratislava, Slovak Republic. National Institute for Health Technology Assessment, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Czech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, , Brno, Czech Republic. Centre for Immunization Readiness, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Michael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, LS K, Canada. schuneh@mcmaster.ca.

Abstract summary 

The COVID-19 pandemic underlined that guidelines and recommendations must be made more accessible and more understandable to the general public to improve health outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate, quantify, and compare the public's understanding, usability, satisfaction, intention to implement, and preference for different ways of presenting COVID-19 health recommendations derived from the COVID-19 Living Map of Recommendations and Gateway to Contextualization (RecMap).This is a protocol for a multi-method study. Through an online survey, we will conduct pragmatic allocation-concealed, blinded superiority randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in three populations to test alternative formats of presenting health recommendations: adults, parents, and youth, with at least 240 participants in each population. Prior to initiating the RCT, our interventions will have been refined with relevant stakeholder input. The intervention arm will receive a plain language recommendation (PLR) format while the control arm will receive the corresponding original recommendation format as originally published by the guideline organizations (standard language version). Our primary outcome is understanding, and our secondary outcomes are accessibility and usability, satisfaction, intended behavior, and preference for the recommendation formats. Each population's results will be analyzed separately. However, we are planning a meta-analysis of the results across populations. At the end of each survey, participants will be invited to participate in an optional one-on-one, virtual semi-structured interview to explore their user experience. All interviews will be transcribed and analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis and a hybrid inductive and deductive approach.Through Clinical Trials Ontario, the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board has reviewed and approved this protocol (Project ID: 3856). The University of Alberta has approved the parent portion of the trial (Project ID:00114894). Findings from this study will be disseminated through open-access publications in peer-reviewed journals and using social media.Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05358990 . Registered on May 3, 2022.

Authors & Co-authors:  Charide Stallwood Munan Sayfi Hartling Butcher Offringa Elliott Richards Mathew Akl Kredo Mbuagbaw Motillal Baba Prebeg Relihan Scott Suvada Falavigna Klugar Lotfi Stevens Pottie Schünemann

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Lotfi T, Stevens A, Akl EA, Falavigna M, Kredo T, Mathew JL, et al. Getting trustworthy guidelines into the hands of decision-makers and supporting their consideration of contextual factors for implementation globally: recommendation mapping of COVID-19 guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;135:182–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.034.
Authors :  25
Identifiers
Doi : 27
SSN : 1745-6215
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
COVID-19;Knowledge mobilization;Plain language recommendation;Public engagement;Randomized controlled trial;Standard language versions;eCOVID RecMap
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England