How well do neural signatures of resting-state EEG detect consciousness? A large-scale clinical study.

Journal: Human brain mapping

Volume: 45

Issue: 4

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Neurobiology and Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. MOE Frontier Science Center for Brain Science and Brain-machine Integration, and the Affiliated Mental Health Center & Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. Department of Rehabilitation, Hangzhou Mingzhou Brain Rehabilitation Hospital, Hangzhou, China. Department of Neurosurgery, Jinshan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontiers Center for Brain Science, Institute for Translational Brain Research, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Abstract summary 

The assessment of consciousness states, especially distinguishing minimally conscious states (MCS) from unresponsive wakefulness states (UWS), constitutes a pivotal role in clinical therapies. Despite that numerous neural signatures of consciousness have been proposed, the effectiveness and reliability of such signatures for clinical consciousness assessment still remains an intense debate. Through a comprehensive review of the literature, inconsistent findings are observed about the effectiveness of diverse neural signatures. Notably, the majority of existing studies have evaluated neural signatures on a limited number of subjects (usually below 30), which may result in uncertain conclusions due to small data bias. This study presents a systematic evaluation of neural signatures with large-scale clinical resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) signals containing 99 UWS, 129 MCS, 36 emergence from the minimally conscious state, and 32 healthy subjects (296 total) collected over 3 years. A total of 380 EEG-based metrics for consciousness detection, including spectrum features, nonlinear measures, functional connectivity, and graph-based measures, are summarized and evaluated. To further mitigate the effect of data bias, the evaluation is performed with bootstrap sampling so that reliable measures can be obtained. The results of this study suggest that relative power in alpha and delta serve as dependable indicators of consciousness. With the MCS group, there is a notable increase in the phase lag index-related connectivity measures and enhanced functional connectivity between brain regions in comparison to the UWS group. A combination of features enables the development of an automatic detector of conscious states.

Authors & Co-authors:  Ma Qi Xu Weng Yu Sun Yu Wu Gao Li Shu Duan Luo Pan

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Aboy, M. , Hornero, R. , Abásolo, D. , & Álvarez, D. (2006). Interpretation of the Lempel‐Ziv complexity measure in the context of biomedical signal analysis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 53, 2282–2288.
Authors :  14
Identifiers
Doi : e26586
SSN : 1097-0193
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
consciousness;minimally conscious state;resting-state EEG;unresponsive wakefulness state
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States