Examining the criteria of human dignity.

Journal: Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine

Volume: 16

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Researcher, University of Religions and Denominations, Research Center for Religions and Denominations; Researcher, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Researcher, Mental Health Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Resident of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Researcher, Endocrine and Metabolism Research Institute, Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. PhD Candidate in Medical ethics, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Researcher, Sina Trauma & Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract summary 

One of the critical aspects in discussing human dignity is the establishment of its criterion, a standard unique to humans. This criterion should effectively create a fundamental and structural distinction from other creatures. Initially, our focus was on the endeavors of biologists to differentiate the human species from others, emphasizing the physical aspects. However, physical and genetic differences lack the necessary characteristics to serve as a criterion for dignity. Subsequently, we explored the notion of this criterion in human behavior. Yet, given that behavior stems from human thought, it proves unsuitable as a criterion for dignity. Thus, our quest led us to explore human wisdom. However, since wisdom, like other abilities, serves as a tool for improved living and is present to some extent in other animals, it proves inadequate as a criterion. We have determined that the distinguishing characteristic lies in the power of choice or free will, setting humans apart from other living beings whose behavior is solely instinctual or driven by needs. Consequently, free choice forms the foundation of dignity, assigning value to the chooser based on the choices made.

Authors & Co-authors:  Jafari Araminia Tavasoli Tavasoli Abedi Fayaz Bakhshe

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Brännmark J. Respect for persons in bioethics: towards a human rights-based account. Human Rights Review. 2017;18(2):171–87.
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 14
SSN : 2008-0387
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Criterion of dignity;Free selection of virtues;Freedom of choice;Human dignity;Voluntary compliance with belief.
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Iran