The Brief Solastalgia Scale: A Psychometric Evaluation and Revision.

Journal: EcoHealth

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Bruce.Christensen@anu.edu.au. School of Medicine and Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Centre for Entrepreneurial Agri-Technology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Centre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.

Abstract summary 

Witnessing degradation and loss to one's home environment can cause the negative emotional experience of solastalgia. We review the psychometric properties of the 9-item Solastalgia subscale from the Environmental Distress Scale (Higginbotham et al. (EcoHealth 3:245-254, 2006)). Using data collected from three large, independent, adult samples (N = 4229), who were surveyed soon after the 2019/20 Australian bushfires, factor analyses confirmed the scale's unidimensionality, while analyses derived from Item Response Theory highlighted the poor psychometric performance and redundant content of specific items. Consequently, we recommend a short-form scale consisting of five items. This Brief Solastalgia Scale (BSS) yielded excellent model fit and internal consistency in both the initial and cross-validation samples. The BSS and its parent version provide very similar patterns of associations with demographic, health, life satisfaction, climate emotion, and nature connectedness variables. Finally, multi-group confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated comparable construct architecture (i.e. configural, metric, and scalar invariance) across validation samples, gender categories, and age. As individuals and communities increasingly confront and cope with climate change and its consequences, understanding related emotional impacts is crucial. The BSS promises to aid researchers, decision makers, and practitioners to understand and support those affected by negative environmental change.

Authors & Co-authors:  Christensen Monaghan Stanley Walker Leviston Macleod Rodney Greenwood Heffernan Evans Sutherland Reynolds Calear Kurz Lane

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Adler NE, Epel E, Castellazzo G, Ickovics J (2000) Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology 19:586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
Authors :  15
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1007/s10393-024-01673-y
SSN : 1612-9210
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Bushfire;Environmental Distress Scale;Factor analysis;Psychometric;Short form;Solastalgia
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States