ARRIVE Together: A Qualitative Process Evaluation of the New Jersey State Police Co-responding Pilot Program.

Journal: Behavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.)

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Health Behavior, Society, & Policy, School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA. School of Public Health, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, USA. School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, USA.

Abstract summary 

Law enforcement personnel are often first to respond to calls involving behavioral health emergencies. However, encounters with law enforcement are more dangerous and lethal for people with behavioral health conditions. Co-responding models, wherein law enforcement and behavioral health professionals respond to calls together, are among the top programs developed to improve responding to behavioral health crises. The current study describes a qualitative process evaluation of a co-responding pilot program in New Jersey: "Alternative Responses to Reduce Instances of Violence & Escalation" (ARRIVE Together). The evaluation centered on the experience of the co-responding team as to their perceptions of specific deployments and of the program implementation overall. Semi-structured interviews were conducted following 10 consecutive encounters (three interviews per encounter; February-March 2022). Transcripts were transcribed and thematically analyzed by two trained researchers independently. Once thematically analyzed, researchers determined a consensus and developed a SWOT analysis report. Thematic analysis produced six major themes: communication, staffing, training, resources, community outreach, and deployments with minors. Overall, participants were enthusiastic about the program, but they shared numerous observations about ways in which the program could be improved. Sample size, the brief follow-up window, and lack of generalizability to other contexts were among the most limiting factors. Further research should include an effectiveness evaluation and extend to urban and suburban communities and communities of color. Future research should also explore after-response affects including accessibility to follow-up care. The current study gives insight into piloting a co-responding model for approaching behavioral health crisis calls.

Authors & Co-authors:  Anestis Halkitis Cordeiro Lanman Passannante

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  5
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1080/08964289.2024.2324793
SSN : 0896-4289
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Behavioral health;co-response model;law enforcement;mental health interventions
Study Design
Study Approach
Qualitative
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States