A framework for inferring and analyzing pharmacotherapy treatment patterns.

Journal: BMC medical informatics and decision making

Volume: 24

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. erush@vols.utk.edu. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA. University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC, USA. VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. Palo Alto VA Healthcare System, Palo Alto, CA, USA. VA Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Aurora, CO, USA.

Abstract summary 

To discover pharmacotherapy prescription patterns and their statistical associations with outcomes through a clinical pathway inference framework applied to real-world data.We apply machine learning steps in our framework using a 2006 to 2020 cohort of veterans with major depressive disorder (MDD). Outpatient antidepressant pharmacy fills, dispensed inpatient antidepressant medications, emergency department visits, self-harm, and all-cause mortality data were extracted from the Department of Veterans Affairs Corporate Data Warehouse.Our MDD cohort consisted of 252,179 individuals. During the study period there were 98,417 emergency department visits, 1,016 cases of self-harm, and 1,507 deaths from all causes. The top ten prescription patterns accounted for 69.3% of the data for individuals starting antidepressants at the fluoxetine equivalent of 20-39 mg. Additionally, we found associations between outcomes and dosage change.For 252,179 Veterans who served in Iraq and Afghanistan with subsequent MDD noted in their electronic medical records, we documented and described the major pharmacotherapy prescription patterns implemented by Veterans Health Administration providers. Ten patterns accounted for almost 70% of the data. Associations between antidepressant usage and outcomes in observational data may be confounded. The low numbers of adverse events, especially those associated with all-cause mortality, make our calculations imprecise. Furthermore, our outcomes are also indications for both disease and treatment. Despite these limitations, we demonstrate the usefulness of our framework in providing operational insight into clinical practice, and our results underscore the need for increased monitoring during critical points of treatment.

Authors & Co-authors:  Rush Ozmen Kim Ortegon Jones Park Pizer Trafton Brenner Ward Nebeker

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7.
Authors :  11
Identifiers
Doi : 68
SSN : 1472-6947
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Clinical pathways;Major depressive disorder;Process mining
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England