Comparison of the 12-item and 36-item versions of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 using longitudinal data from community mental health outreach service users.

Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology reports

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Community Mental Health & Law, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract summary 

This study aimed to compare the 12-item and 36-item versions of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 using longitudinal data from community mental health outreach service users.Using data from Tokorozawa City mental health outreach service users in Japan, total and domain WHODAS-12 and WHODAS-36 scores were compared. First, we examined score-change differences by domain at the start of outreach services (T1) and 1 year later (T2) for each version. Next, we compared differences between the two versions using Pearson's correlation, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Bland-Altman analysis.Among 20 participants, total scores and scores of some domains (i.e., cognition, getting along, life activities, and participation) were significantly lower at T2 than at T1 on both versions (p < 0.010). WHODAS-36 scores were significantly lower at T2 than at T1 for the self-care domain (p = 0.018). Except for self-care, strong correlations were found between scores from the two versions (p < 0.001). In the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Bland-Altman analysis, we found significant differences between the scores of the two versions in the mobility, self-care, and participation domains. There were no significant differences in the distribution or systematic errors between the two versions in scores for the other domains or total score.We found strong positive correlations between WHODAS-12 and WHODAS-36 total scores with no statistical differences between them. For some domains, differences in distribution and systematic errors were found.

Authors & Co-authors:  Iwanaga Yamaguchi Sato Usui Nakanishi Nishiuchi Shimodaira So Fujii

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  McKenzie E, Matkin L, Sousa Fialho L, Emelurumonye IN, Gintner T, Ilesanmi C, et al. Developing an international standard set of patient-reported outcome measures for psychotic disorders. Psychiatr Serv. 2022;73(3):249-258.
Authors :  9
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1002/npr2.12426
SSN : 2574-173X
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
WHODAS 2.0;community mental health;comparison;longitudinal study;outreach;schizophrenia (clinical)
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States