Would've, could've, should've: a cross-sectional investigation of whether and how healthcare staff's working conditions and mental health symptoms have changed throughout 3 pandemic years.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 14

Issue: 3

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Occupational, Economic, and Social Psychology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria julia.reiter@univie.ac.at. Department of Psychology, PFH Private University of Applied Sciences, Göttingen, Germany. Department of Community Psychology, FernUniversitat in Hagen, Hagen, Germany.

Abstract summary 

Mental health and well-being of healthcare staff were majorly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Little attention has been devoted to the role employers could choose to play in mitigating long-term negative consequences and how effective organisational measures taken were perceived by the individual healthcare workers. This study aims to investigate (1) whether and how healthcare professionals' mental health has changed from the second to the third pandemic year, (2) whether differences between professional groups (physicians, nurses, paramedics) identified in previous studies persisted and (3) how job demands and resources, for example, work culture and employers' measures, impacted this situation.The study employs an observational, cross-sectional design, using an online survey.The study was conducted online from mid-June to mid-August 2022 among healthcare staff in state-run and private healthcare facilities, such as doctor's practices, hospitals and paramedic organisations, in Germany and Austria (n=421).We measured psychological strain using an ICD-10-based symptom checklist, as well as subjective strain and importance of stressors using self-report questions. The ICD-10 was the 10th version of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, a widely used standardized diagnostic manual.Psychological strain stayed relatively consistent, with nursing staff suffering the most. While the job demands participants felt most affected by were structural issues (eg, staff shortages), employers were far more likely to be perceived as taking action against pandemic-specific job demands (eg, lack of protective gear). Psychological strain was lowest when staff perceived employers' actions as effective. Only 60% of those with severe enough symptoms to require psychological help had intentions of seeking such help, which is in line with past studies. This help-seeking hesitancy was also dependent on different facets of perceived work culture.Healthcare staff and nursing staff in particular continue to suffer in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, while employers were perceived as taking action against pandemic-specific job demands, pre-existing job demands causing stress and psychological strain for staff have remained uncombatted.

Authors & Co-authors:  Reiter Weibelzahl Duden

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Cénat JM, Blais-Rochette C, Kokou-Kpolou CK, et al. . Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, Posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 2021;295:113599. 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113599
Authors :  3
Identifiers
Doi : e076712
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
MENTAL HEALTH;Occupational Stress;Organisation of health services;Quality in health care
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
England