What I see, what you say: How cross-method variation sharpens characterization of irritability in early childhood.

Journal: International journal of methods in psychiatric research

Volume: 33

Issue: 1

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA. Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA. San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, California, USA. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health System, Farmington, Connecticut, USA. Feinberg School of Medicine and Institute for Innovations in Developmental Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.

Abstract summary 

Identification of clinically significant irritability in preschool age is important to implement effective interventions. However, varying informant and measurement methods display distinct patterns. These patterns are associated with concurrent and future mental health concerns. Patterns across multi-informant methods in early-childhood irritability may have clinical utility, identifying risk for impaired psychosocial functioning.Using data from the Multidimensional Assessment of Preschoolers Study (N = 425), latent profile analysis identified irritability patterns through the parent-reported Multidimensional Assessment Profile Scales-Temper Loss (MAPS-TL), parent-reported interviewer-rated Preschool Age Psychiatric Assessment (PAPA), and observer-rated Disruptive Behavior Diagnostic Observation Schedule (DB-DOS). These profiles were characterized on protective factors, global functioning, and mental health syndromes, concurrently and at early school age and preadolescent follow-up.Fit indices favored a five-class model: Low All, High Observation with Examiner (high DB-DOS Examiner Context), High All, High Parent Report (high MAPS-TL/PAPA), and Very High Parent Report (very high MAPS-TL/PAPA). Whereas Low All and High Observation with Examiner exhibited strong psychosocial functioning, remaining profiles showed impaired psychosocial functioning, with the Very High Parent Report group showing higher impairment at follow-ups, ds = 0.37-1.25.Multi-informant measurements of irritability may have utility for clinical prediction, and future studies should test utility for diagnostic precision.

Authors & Co-authors:  Parker Brock Kryza-Lacombe Briggs-Gowan Dougherty Wakschlag Wiggins

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Ablow, J. C. , Measelle, J. R. , Kraemer, H. C. , Harrington, R. , Luby, J. , Smider, N. , Dierker, L. , Clark, V. , Dubicka, B. , Heffelfinger, A. , Essex, M. J. , & Kupfer, D. J. (1999). The MacArthur Three‐City Outcome Study: Evaluating multi‐informant measures of young children's symptomatology. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 38(12), 1580–1590. 10.1097/00004583-199912000-00020
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : e2019
SSN : 1557-0657
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
assessment;child psychiatry;emotion dysregulation;irritability;measurement
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States