A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: Perspectives from Seattle, Washington.

Journal: PloS one

Volume: 19

Issue: 3

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America. Department of Native American Studies, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America. Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America. citiesRise, New York, New York, United States of America.

Abstract summary 

In March 2021, the Governor of Washington declared a youth mental health crisis. State data revealed high rates of youth suicide and inadequate access to services. This study aims to ascertain the kinds of support across the mental health care continuum recommended by young people and key stakeholders who could assist with implementation in Seattle. We interviewed 15 key informants to identify the contextual, structural, and individual-level factors that increase the risk of poor mental health and deter access to care among youth. We complimented these data with a 25-item survey of 117 participants in King County to assess the feasibility and acceptability of interventions for youth mental health. We conducted a deductive thematic qualitative analysis of the interviews and performed descriptive analyses of the quantitative data, using t-tests and χ2 tests to summarize and compare participant characteristics stratified by age group. Qualitative informants attributed challenges to youth mental health to social isolation and relational problems. Example interventions included creating environments that increase belonging and implementation of culturally congruent mental health services. Quantitative study participants rated all evidence-based mental health interventions presented as highly acceptable. However, youth preferred interventions promoting social connectedness, peer support, and holistic approaches to care, while non-youth preferred interventions focused on suicide, and substance abuse prevention. Key informants and survey participants identified schools as the most important setting for mental health interventions. There were no significant differences among quantitative outcomes. Our findings highlight the need for interventions that reduce isolation and increase social connectedness to support youth mental health. As the city designs youth responsive interventions, schools and digital platforms should be prioritized. Engaging multiple stakeholders, particularly young people, tackling cultural stigma surrounding mental health, and improving access to safe community spaces are important considerations for youth mental health interventions.

Authors & Co-authors:  Mensa-Kwao Sub Cuc Concepcion Kemp Hughsam Sinha Collins

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Office of the Surgeon G. Publications and Reports of the Surgeon General. Protecting Youth Mental Health: The US Surgeon General’s Advisory. Washington (DC): US Department of Health and Human Services; 2021.
Authors :  7
Identifiers
Doi : e0288214
SSN : 1932-6203
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Humans
Other Terms
Study Design
Study Approach
Quantitative,Qualitative
Country of Study
Publication Country
United States