Lived experience allyship in mental health services: Recommendations for improved uptake of allyship roles in support of peer workforces.

Journal: International journal of mental health nursing

Volume: 

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Clinical Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. UnitingSA, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Abstract summary 

Inclusion of service users in the design and delivery of mental health services is clearly articulated throughout Australian mental health action plans and stated as an expectation within contemporary mental health policy. International and local Australian research demonstrates benefits for the inclusion of lived experience workers in service users' recovery journey; however, persistent challenges and barriers limit their effective integration into transdisciplinary mental health service teams. Non-lived experience workers who actively advocate and champion the inclusion of lived experience or peer workers, known as allies, are acknowledged and recognised as enablers for effective integration of peer workers to service teams. In this discursive paper, authors present recommendations for further development of allyship roles within leadership positions of mental health organisations in Australia. Leaders are in a position to influence the allocation of resources, redress power inequalities and facilitate opportunities for the inclusion of lived experience expertise across all levels of mental health organisations. This paper makes recommendations for areas of learning and unlearning ingrained bias and assumptions which may be detrimental to integration of lived experience workforces and hinder movement toward greater adoption of recovery-orientated service delivery.

Authors & Co-authors:  Reeves Loughhead Teague Halpin Procter

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Ahmed, A.O., Hunter, K.M., Mabe, A.P., Tucker, S.J. & Buckley, P.F. (2015) The professional experiences of peer specialists in the Georgia mental health consumer network. Community Mental Health Journal, 51(4), 424-436. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-015-9854-8
Authors :  5
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1111/inm.13322
SSN : 1447-0349
Study Population
Male,Female
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
allyship;lived experience;mental health recovery;peer support;service integration
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Australia