High persistence and low treatment rates of metabolic syndrome in patients with mood and anxiety disorders: A naturalistic follow-up study.

Journal: Journal of affective disorders

Volume: 354

Issue: 

Year of Publication: 

Affiliated Institutions:  Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Wilhelmina Hospital Assen, Assen, the Netherlands; GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Services, Assen, the Netherlands; Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: jurriaan.brouwer@mzh.nl. GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Services, Assen, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Services, Assen, the Netherlands; Rob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Lentis Research, Groningen, the Netherlands. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Wilhelmina Hospital Assen, Assen, the Netherlands. GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Services, Assen, the Netherlands; Research School of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurosciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Rob Giel Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Abstract summary 

Patients with affective and anxiety disorders are at risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and, consequently, cardiovascular disease and premature death. In this study, the course and treatment of MetS was investigated using longitudinal data from a naturalistic sample of affective- and anxiety-disordered outpatients (Monitoring Outcome of psychiatric PHARmacotherapy [MOPHAR]).Demographics, clinical characteristics, medication use, and MetS components were obtained for n = 2098 patients at baseline and, in a FU-subsample of n = 507 patients, after a median follow-up (FU) of 11 months. Furthermore, pharmacological treatment rates of MetS were investigated at baseline and FU. Finally, demographic and clinical determinants of change in MetS (component) scores were investigated.At baseline, 34.6 % of n = 2098 patients had MetS, 41.4 % of whom received treatment. Of patients with persisting MetS, 46.1 % received treatment for one (or more) MetS component(s) at baseline, and 56.6 % received treatment at FU. Treatment rates of solely elevated blood pressure and reduced HDL-cholesterol did significantly, but modestly, improve. Higher age, male sex, smoking behavior, low education, diabetes, and depressive versus anxiety disorder were predictors of worse outcome at FU on at least one MetS component.We did not have data on lifestyle interventions as a form of treatment, which might partly have explained the observed low pharmacotherapeutic treatment rates.MetS (components) show high persistence rates in affective- and anxiety-disordered patients, and are, despite adequate monitoring, undertreated over time. This indicates that adherence and implementation of monitoring protocols should be crucially improved in psychiatric outpatients in secondary care.

Authors & Co-authors:  Brouwer Wardenaar Liemburg Doornbos Mulder Cath

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations : 
Authors :  6
Identifiers
Doi : 10.1016/j.jad.2024.03.042
SSN : 1573-2517
Study Population
Male
Mesh Terms
Other Terms
Anxiety disorders;Metabolic syndrome;Mood disorders;Outpatient;Treatment
Study Design
Study Approach
Country of Study
Publication Country
Netherlands