Comprehensive quality assessment for aphasia rehabilitation after stroke: protocol for a multicentre, mixed-methods study.

Journal: BMJ open

Volume: 14

Issue: 3

Year of Publication: 2024

Affiliated Institutions:  Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia sam.harvey@uq.edu.au. Queensland Aphasia Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia. Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia. Stroke Theme, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Victoria, Australia. Centre for Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Department of Neurology with Institute of Translational Neurology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany. Curtin School of Allied Health and EnAble Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia. Surgical, Treatment and Rehabilitation Service Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia. Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

Abstract summary 

People with aphasia following stroke experience disproportionally poor outcomes, yet there is no comprehensive approach to measuring the quality of aphasia services. The Meaningful Evaluation of Aphasia SeRvicES (MEASuRES) minimum dataset was developed in partnership with people with lived experience of aphasia, clinicians and researchers to address this gap. It comprises sociodemographic characteristics, quality indicators, treatment descriptors and outcome measurement instruments. We present a protocol to pilot the MEASuRES minimum dataset in clinical practice, describe the factors that hinder or support implementation and determine meaningful thresholds of clinical change for core outcome measurement instruments.This research aims to deliver a comprehensive quality assessment toolkit for poststroke aphasia services in four studies. A multicentre pilot study (study 1) will test the administration of the MEASuRES minimum dataset within five Australian health services. An embedded mixed-methods process evaluation (study 2) will evaluate the performance of the minimum dataset and explore its clinical applicability. A consensus study (study 3) will establish consumer-informed thresholds of meaningful change on core aphasia outcome constructs, which will then be used to establish minimal important change values for corresponding core outcome measurement instruments (study 4).Studies 1 and 2 have been registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12623001313628). Ethics approval has been obtained from the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (HREC/2023/MNHB/95293) and The University of Queensland (2022/HE001946 and 2023/HE001175). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and engagement with relevant stakeholders including healthcare providers, policy-makers, stroke and rehabilitation audit and clinical quality registry custodians, consumer support organisations, and individuals with aphasia and their families.

Authors & Co-authors:  Harvey Stone Zingelman Copland Kilkenny Godecke Cadilhac Kim Olaiya Rose Breitenstein Shrubsole O'Halloran Hill Hersh Mainstone Mainstone Unsworth Brogan Short Burns Baker Wallace

Study Outcome 

Source Link: Visit source

Statistics
Citations :  Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, et al. . Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. The Lancet Neurology 2021;20:795–820. 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0
Authors :  23
Identifiers
Doi : e080532
SSN : 2044-6055
Study Population
Female
Mesh Terms
Female
Other Terms
Observational Study;Quality in health care;Stroke
Study Design
Study Approach
Mixed-Methods
Country of Study
Publication Country
England